Thursday, June 30, 2016

Hee Haw

"Guns and God are our Religion..." Weapons and a Clean Conscience are two things that those whom people elect into office pretend to have, claim to have, and are supposed to have. They are elected from and by the people, supposedly. Therefore it is supposed to be the case that they reflect the social norms and mores of those people. Therefore the norm of a person "fit for office" is someone able to take up arms with a good conscience whenever it is dictated by duties of office, which are supposed to be consistent with religious norms. So "God and Guns" is the STATE RELIGION, or "Right and Might" or many other pertinent mottoes and dicta. There IS no creed which does not claim that authority is rightly vested with the power to admonish and if necessary to kill. That's history and the facts of nature. So while it is not necessarily the case that Palin or Trump or ANY supposed "conservative" of any stripe is fit to hold office, it doesn't mean that the basis by which they claim that right has no claim to truth. Someone who is right and able WILL TAKE POWER inevitably.

This video does make an amusing aesthetic remark, which might even be a subconscious acceptance of the reality that at least the veneer of authority, and the enthusiasm with which "conservatives" (nominal or actual) will claim that human dignity and honor require a moral basis and require being physically secured with the right, will, and ability to take up arms in their defense. Really, there is no other claim in existence for worldly authority, because even the "cynical left" will claim that the vicissitudes of how authority works naturally and historically requires at least a certain rhetoric of beneficence, as understood to function in a utilitarian way on the surface at least. So a certain representation of "normative right" is required in any case for authority to have hold over people's cooperation. Otherwise only brute force will be sufficient.

There is some force which must administer over these processes, these forces of the expression of force as something which those who wield it are supposed to be exempt from blame. Exempt that is, if they can establish the consensus belief that they represent "everyone's best interest" in a way that people at least habitually and perfunctorily cede to be the case. They pay enough lip service, are well fed enough, have enough things to do which alleviate boredom, stress, anxiety, and then they go along to get alone enough that the agendas of those who actually wield power passes over them, in search for the taller nail.

And those types of administrators of power don't care what veneer it takes to achieve their goals, and so their number one agenda with the public will be to ensure their covert control over overt institutions of power that people accept as a facade reflective of their traditions and mores, or at least their acculturated expectations of what should be social norms and what role government has ministering to it or administrating over it. That is the supreme "realpolitik" that was understood by Plato, Machiavelli, Hobbes, Hegel, Nietszche, Foucault and anyone else who ever wielded or in principle understood worldly power. That being the case, any mockery of such a facade which claims it has only a facile grip on claims to authority misses the point entirely.

And while those on the left have their cynical modes of paying lip-services, those on the right do as well. It is not even out of the question that some claims have a lot more veracity than other. If for one tend to resonate with the "overall aesthetic" of this somewhat comedic yet transparently reverential video depicting Donald Trump into a more "urban pimp with a cause", versus Sarah Palin's "country hick with a groove".

The point is that those who administrate through the publicly accepted institutions of authority, which is the right to admonish to the point of bestowing either honor or punishment as the reward for responding in a way that satisfies strictly the administrators of authority, however represented in the social infrastructure, are not necessarily relying upon their substantial mandate nor the public's sincere acceptance of it. And therefore one must understand that the calculus of "realpolitikal" power demands that we accept the probable conclusion that pragmatic distortions of these dynamics of good faith relations of public to authority have been already employed, that a sort of "Snell's Law" exists which dictates that the publicly acknowledged discourse of authority, and the public's cooperation with those who represent those offices of authority, is refracted so that there is a significant distortion between the image of rightful authority as rightful and its actual status. It is unfortunately the norm for "the human condition" in this worldly domain that this angle of refraction is naturally severe enough as to raise, at minimum, serious consequences immediately upon reflection.

Two directions of implications immediately arise.

1) Metaphysical Context, Simple

In this context there is a necessity for us to understand the natural facts as empirically presented, which discover the disparity between appearances and beliefs about what is right and what actually takes place behind authority structures which sustain their hold over populations by means of a pretense which is sufficiently convincing of their audience, who are called "the people" in a democracy, but are recognized as being "the citizens" in a republic, and in a given republic it is not automatically the case that every person who lives as part of the nation is a citizen, or even a full person! The problem which immediately arises is that this disparity exists, but there is a large body of cultural work which suggests that people understand that there is a moral authority which genuinely transcends physical power. Some hold that it exists as an ideal which can be understood by "just souls", who "more participate" in that ideal, and some claim that a personal authority exists in some transcendent realm, or at least operatively in this immanent realm, which embodies that ultimate model of such righteousness. At all events, all parties admit that they must at least some of the time pay lip service to this idea. At a minimum, even if this is an illusion which people use to psychologically shield themselves from a naked admission of a submission to naked power, even those who say "power issues from the barrel of a gun" must admit that they need to convince their cohorts that it will not be issued at them unless they go severely wrong in certain well-defined ways, and this must also be promulgated through the propaganda, or this image must at least not be defeated by cultural forces which develop public consensus, at least stably enough and overall long enough to allow them to pursue their agendas while operating completely in bad faith as a psychopathic predator class upon the human species (as a form of psychological "royalty" exempt from the false moralities criticized by the existentialist school, and rightly).

2) Metaphysical Context, Complex

This The above is a possible interpretation of the world, but the idealized moral authority is not only a linguistic trick that organic robots are trained to perform with no real meaning given the terms it uses, or else merely an arbitrary meaning. In fact Moral Authority IS REAL, but simply misrepresented by false stewards, usurpers and pretenders to this Office. This is a premise which we add to the first, morally flat narrative and it turns out that it provides, and is itself supported by a larger context which resolves contradictions which arise from the the morally flat narrative, and does this without resort to moral epiphenominalism or physicalist-evolutionary reductionism. In other words it provides a metaphysical context which is both logically consistent and ontologically real, and it reveals its contrary as being explicable both in terms of its self-contradictory aspects, as well as to its motives and agendas. Hence, this second, metaphysically more robust position reveals the world "as it really is and must be".

This is the position of Gnostic Metaphysics in actuality, when all of the theological discourse is reduced by the appropriate "logos" (logic) so as to transduce the morally flat discourse of the world into a paradigm which is properly texturized, ethically and cognitively, for a being who actually holds the Spirit of Truth as their internal locus of control, and cannot be corrupted or subverted by the false prophets of the metaphysically oversimple "moral flatland" suggested in the discourse which is blandly broadcast by the pervasively corrupt culture and its current power hegemonies. Those who administrate over that process are now understood to be not "merely" opportunistic psychopaths, which they plainly are, but are now understood to be morally objectionable to an infinite degree. This is understood in the religious mind as a willingness to hold in contempt any relations with someone, or something, who is so morally wrong, so ethically wrong, in that such relations would contaminate one's own Good Conscience, let alone offend one's dignity and besmirch one's honor.

Such people know better what to disdain, and there is a long tradition of these people being universally acknowledged to be the True Pillars of the World, in that their image is stolen by frauds so that their fragile false world can continue being propped up as though a mighty dome of stability sanctioned by "heaven" (to include even a Confucian interpretation of the term), while their pretended mandate is actually null. It is the case then that there are two ontological types, one who bears the substance (the real "right" one) and the one who "at best" bears only the image (the false "right" one). They cannot coexist, being ontological opposites, and the disparity between substance and appearance will be used to shield the false authority from just attacks, and bolster unjust attacks against the True Authority. No one graduates Plato's Acadamy without knowing this.

Metaphysical Deduction

There is a consequence of the above two metaphysical lines of implication, which converges their opposed logics into a unified conclusion which takes the first to be the "false" and "stolen" image of the second, which is Substantively True, and even logically and ethically derivable and realizable from the (only) opposing position.The deduction which is a necessary consequence in all possible worlds, and which is derived from the maximal opposition of two metaphysical contrary paradigms, the only two which can possibly exist in any syntactically logical form, results in only one paradigm which converges the facile attractions of the first position upon the substantial semantic basis of the second, a basis which is referred to in both positions, but exists uniquely only in the second.

Now, referring to the degree to which there is a cognitive bias against realizing this deduction in any form, we have a series of results which hinge upon this realization, thus deduced.

1) The persons who are subjugated by the falsification of authority are at minimum cognitively invalid.

2) They are cognitively invalid to a degree which exceeds reasonable expectations based upon the very syntax of their paradigmatics, which suggest some relation to a substantive, genuine authority, though we know such would never be subjected to such falsification willingly and/or knowingly.

3) Therefore, as a function of operative cognitive action in the world, the populace is largely incompetent to assess the situation of their current socio-political conditions in a deliberate and self-propelled way.

4) It is yet possible that some persons are Spiritually Real and yet whose cognition has been disabled by various vectors of psychological/biological/economic warfare, conducted against them directly and indirectly.

5) Historically, currently and empirically, and logically it can be shown that 1-4 are true, and this leads to 5 inexorably, and the opposite is self-contradictory by both logical and empirical evidence.

6) If any who act according to the description of the beliefs in paradigm 1, including those who actively belief in those descriptions or not, but who act as it describes (and are even properly described by it, the soul-less people of a merely physical nature, for example), if any of this type have access to any covert technological means to alter people's cognitive abilities as described in 4 and proven by 5 then they will develop those means and deploy them in any way necessary to sustain their preferred agendas of control over everything that they can control, including any public narratives about right and wrong, but minimally of what is real or unreal, true or false (think "false flag" discourse, including false flag narratives of false flag events at one extreme).

7) Psychotronics is a term referring to a well-developed, factually existing means of such warfare, and it even has open, publicly visible aspects, though most of its function is hidden and deployed against all the public covertly through a dual-purposed infrastructure both civil and physical-technological.

8) Through 6 and 7 we reach 8, which states here that such a system, and all its adjunctive systems which it catalyzes and regulates/supervises, rooted in the ancient prerogatives assumed by primitive and evil minds, is now also controlled and used by their modern counterparts.

9) And since a factual and logical catalog of the phenomena of the world, seen through the angular distortion now acknowledged to be ramified to a high degree by psychotronic and various other vectors of catalysis and augmentation, convinces us that this distortion has radically impaired people's cognitive capabilities to such a degree that even if they could have developed a fully awake and conscientious personhood capable of acting authoritatively in the world, then those would be systematically regulated by this system so as to make them mere suzerains of a false sovereign. Therefore even the Best can be overruled by the worst, which is understood by real philosophers to be "the worst possible world".

10) And as predicted, since anything which is true in all possible worlds must be true in even the worst possible worlds, and because these deductions are proven in the worst possible world (not only in a model of it), then in fact the necessity of their Truth is Metaphysically Proven.

11) Therefore, the Heavenly Mandate has been ignored and insulted and misrepresented and abusively usurped by frauds for so long, and to such a degree, maximally to this present degree, so that the inevitable consequence, approaching proximally in time in direct proportion to the severity of the evil existing in the world which enables these inversions of reality so that substance and image are so perversely disjointed, WILL without fail arise, arrive, and execute Justice upon this worldly domain, and all current events suggest this will be very soon. How soon? May as well bet the farm on it.

No comments: