The Archontic Trough of Dubious Ambrosia

This is nothing more than guidance on how to groom your little "Tribe" to be a well-adapted, and completely normalized pack of hominids under the control of conformist cultural hegemony.  The principles of this guide include a step which is glowingly nicknamed "Building a Golden Bride to the Future".  When you read propagandistic phrases like that, you know that they are paving over something foul, and spraying too much perfume upon it. 

It's nothing but another cog in the mind-control machine.  Just look at their target audience's shopping habits, eating habits, musical tastes, clothing styles, hairstyles, career choices, etc...  For the mots part, a bunch of proverbial "Bricks in the Wall".

No sense of JUSTICE is encouraged, just some mealy-mouthed manipulation.  "Don't be a dictator UNLESS YOU HAVE TO" but "GIVE EVERYONE A SAY".  This after "AWAY TIME".   

This whole thing treats of emotions as though they were DE FACTO OKAY just because they happen "naturally" in humans, especially as they grow up together and share limited resources (including limited intelligence) and, while behaving in accordance with laws of cause and effect which pertain to these circumstances inevitably either harm or create the appearance of a harm to one another.

While such emotions are unavoidable in the sense of "what is bodily natural", the fact is that a child should be raised to recognize an unfortunate and fatal flaw of their issues of Justice

  Which is that:  Insofar as they are emotionally incontinent and unresponsive to reasoning based upon knowledgeable assessment of the facts, they are a threat to themselves and everyone around them.  They only need to know this when they pose such a threat by becoming angry little tyrants themselves.

On the other hand, if there really IS a harm, then it needs to be taken seriously because that is what good societies DO, and these are the miscreants who will one day grow up and pretend to know right from wrong and tell people what's what with their offices and badges and sharply egotistic mentalities.

This way at least "the machine" they create pays enough lip service to virtues like JUSTICE (rarely understood AS a virtue since the time of Plato) so that whenever evil-doers happen to hold office, it must have been under GREAT PAINS to hide their true character and intentions such that, should they ever be tempted to manifest their evil mindedness they'd be too fearful of being caught by their virtuous superiors (with whom he feigns peerage) that his evil-mindedness would be extinguished with the side effect of a embarrassment, shame, and hopefully a mild sense of disgust at eh prospect of being seen in the eyes of God in such a condition.

That would be the power of a Virtuous Society, one capable of making such an atmosphere which is so antivalent to the nature of evil-mindedness that it cannot even contemplate its goals and their required deeds, nor ever put words to them in his own mind, much less dare speak such thoughts if they happen to take form in his mind.  It is a far superior way for societies to self-regulate than the ones which are utilized by evil bastards in our world.

So how rare it would be for such a fluke to manifest, and how shunted would be his evil effects even should they manifest, though they are not likely to in the end, for if they did manifest then as he feared his superiors would rise up against him and take him down without mercy, and if he didn't manifest such tendencies then it was because of his fear of what he rightly suspected would be their reaction if he were discovered.

And in any world where a fact is hidden, there are at least some worlds where it is discoverable, possibly including his own under certain conditions which for all he knows may be "miraculously supplied".  In this situation the discoverability always is actualized in the Mind of God, and so in fact no matter what it has already been discovered, if not right away by those who in the flesh have yet to either make that discovery through conventional means.  The fact is that from now on there is a "supernatural tendency" for that evil to be discovered, and it becomes stronger in  circumstances where there is less material assistance available for those who are evil-minded in thought, word and deed.  Due to the cause of this effect, the discovery of this fact in abstract terms here is simply as an addendum to the efficacy of their Truth in Reality, which is such that even drawing attention to this Truth makes it become locally MORE TRUE compared to possible worlds where it attention was not selectively drawn to this fact.

Such selective attention can determine what is selectively True by way of pure logic (in various psychological modes) and/or by empirical spectation.  These modes ideally synergize and richly overlap to reveal more information which helps close cognitive gaps which arise because of some deception being  undertaken by an evil-minded being.  Simple perception and assessment in a consistent and well-formed feed-back loop which checks for discrepancies without tiring of avoiding unwarranted assumptions or making fallacious inferences or wild speculations.

That epistemic safeguard undertaken, the ball is in the court of the world to demonstrate at the least consistency between its pretenses and its actual performance.  This is ideally to be discoverable by proof which shines forth with no need of being polished by high-powered PR skills. Simple and direct Truth in Action, revealed for all to see.  No secrets, no deceptions.  And because such evils DO exist in FACT, and this fact is not only discoverable in this world, but already discovered by God, then the conscience, however artificial, of the evil-minded person will expose him to the clairoflaction of his superiors who like keen hounds will smell out his toxic morals.  

But in fact God has lent POWER to this result, and the evil-minded must take pains against it or reach a failure before he has begun, to say nothing of the increase in difficulty as he weaves webs of lies and coverups, and in fact spills blood, physical and or psychical, in his wickedness.  How the energy is transformed when such closets shelter even one skeleton, not to speak of when they are bursting with fresh corpses!

So with the conscious mind bound by Good Sense and Good Reason, it cannot help but pay mind to the Conscience and be warned should something evil be afoot that sense and reason missed, but which God and the deeper and greater mind did not miss, and which issues to our awareness as a sharp alteration in the way it feels to be embodied in the presence of a potential harm (it is a quantum-state fluctuation with unpleasant consequences should it collapse in a certain way upon the person with whom it interacts).

All this information needs to be integrated by the Conscious person in ways which social norms restrict to such a degree that it is more like a giant loony bin controlled by domineering and disingenuous staff of witch doctors.  And so most of the people who read this are bound to misunderstand it and fear it (because it is True and they can't handle it, being a foul part of that Truth and not wanting it to be discovered... though it already has been).  That is simply the last ditch resistance of the ego which will also be extinguished at the appointed time for Judgement. 

The final result is that in order to raise physical children in this world, you have the unenviable task of having started with a miscreant which, at BEST, does not house a Good Spirit, because that would serve you right for your miscreatve act.  Further it would spare that Spirit an untoward sojourn through this hell. At second best it will be Good for You since you will be blessed with a child which bears a True Spirit, and which is probably one better than you since you anchored it from a better place from where it probably Graciously Arrived,and brought it into a lower environ  mainly due to "practical purposes" of the flesh, to include a certain incontinent libido.

Yet maybe it was a Spirit which needed to roost somewhere since it couldn't leave here yet, and would prefer an incarnation to its astral state (for whatever reason), so it was a "win/win" in an overall losing position anyway.  But what are the odds of THAT happening!

Lastly, and most likely, it will be the first case, with this fleshling sprout going to a couple of spiritless flesh fetishists.   Sadly, due to the proliferation of such (as verified by their birthing rate and birth rate), it is more likely that any Good Spirit will end up in the "care" of such miscreants whose adult bodies will be simply stronger and bigger than the body in which They will be forced to start as "apprentice troglodyte in human guise".  They will not do well in their "studies", and will suffer for it immensely, God save them!

But in that rare "win/win" situation, it can be useful advice which is espoused in this article, up to the point where it stickes to negotiation methodologies which serve to diffuse misunderstandings and misperceptions, and hence weed out conflicts owing merely to the defects in our existence which are comprehensively integrated into our "karma-packet bodies" and their inherently clumbsy interactions.  In those cases alone, and with some significant overhaul of the content of this article, it might have been of use in some rare cases in some way similar to the way it pretends to be to an audience we might expect largely wouldn't know better what the difference would be, but are likely to respond well to the ugly chains and tethers of the evil machinery of the archontic state.

YOU JUST KEEP YOUR "HELP"

His rationality and comportment were such that he deserves a laurel around his head whenever being interviewed on this subject!  A good discussion which also links to that interview is found here.

Most important ideas of this discussion could be recapitulated as a simple thesis:

If an agent is willing to help or harm another agent without the receiving agent's full knowledge and freely given permission, then they must be willing to receive whatever compensation is offered by the receiving party, likewise without consideration for the giving agent's full knowledge and freely given permission.  

In other words, this is a crime being committed and the victims have the right to defend themselves accordingly, and also have the right to seek redress for their grievances by way of immediate natural and spiritual, as well as criminal and civil courts!

Worse, it is monstrous crime because it is a fraudulent deception ON TOP of an assault.  In the manner of violation of a person's dignity, liberty and sovereignty it is not unlike a person raping another person and somehow convincing them that it never happened, or that if it did happen it was for their best interests because they were unconsciously asking for it.

"You don't really need to know, or probably even are likely to know what is good for you, so we'll take care of that, you just go to work and pay your taxes...."

Yet it is a Fundamental Right of a Person to fully know and freely decide for or against permission, as well as have that decision respected by all other agents and duly observed in all actions, no matter what the scale of action, no matter what the intention of the action, no matter what the supposed results of the action, and so and so forth.

Therefore we could avoid any circumstances where a person who made a decision to fluoridate a person's or population's water supply or food supply or air supply, etc, would not have to be faced by the victims of that person's actions and force them to hear something like this:  "I am deeply sorry for your loss of health, both mental and physical, and possibly even spiritual.  I acknowledge that my fluoridating your supplies of water, food, and air can be certainly traced as a direct cause of these losses, but the fact is that we felt it was truly in your best interests to have better teeth and bones, even at those costs to you."

That should never have to heard by a person, because something like this should never have been possible, because such actions, regardless of the intentions or motives of their commission, or any other circumstances, should never be taken, being that it is fundamentally a criminal and incivil act, as well as inethical and immoral.

Firstly it is immoral, because any deceptions and fraud are always wrong.

Secondly, it is inethical because it does not take into account the other person's right to be fully knowledgeable and to freely decide whether or not, and in some cases how to deal with something in the greater context of their lives, and yet this sort of intervention would be fundamentally objectionable by the agent doing it if it were done to them by the other person, in other words if it were reciprocal, and so should not be considered an ethical person for choosing to do such a thing.  This inethicality stems from the fact that it is already immoral and there is certifiably NO ONE who would feel ANY sort of fraud or deception performed upon them would ever be ethical, and in fact flies in the face of all ethics!

Thirdly it results in a series of HARMS, these being already moral and ethical harms, certainly this is an incivility, and for these reasons alone it would be a CRIME, punishable by temporal and corporeal laws.  But in fact it is also a material crime, because it actually causes many diseases, disorders, dysfunctions, even to the point of causing such harmful effects as various cancers, organ failure, diminishment of I.Q. and various higher mental functions, hardening of the pineal gland, and from any of these a diminishment of the quality of life along with the probably shortening of it, in many cases by large, untold amounts. A despicable CRIME.

So if a person cannot justify having done this to a person or a population, to their faces, with all the evidence of the wrongfulness, impropriety and criminality of this deed, and they cannot, then it amounts to a crime of such severity as being properly a "Major Crime Against Humanity" and then all the way down to the specific victims, worsening through each political definition (crime these citizens of this country, state, county, district, precinct, ward, household, etc) and through each biological definition (Humanity, Race, Ethnicity, Lineage, Family, Personhood, though spiritually this goes in reverse order and climbs above humanity, in some cases and reaches up to Divinity).

This is such a crime, and such crimes and all crimes would be impossible if people simply acted ethically and morally, but they do not, and so people suffer tangled webs of evil karma instead of tangled webs of good karma.  But that is owning to their natures.  The giant sloggolithic mass of humans DESERVE to be fluoridated!  (isn't that a sad and painful truth?).  But they SHOULDN'T be because it just so happens that the Righteous among them, the Divine among them, are NOT protected from such actions.  Further, we KNOW about them, OBJECT to them, and yet are FORCED to endure them, and not in a vacuum either.  We suffer many other wrongs of which we know and to which we object, but we have no recourse due to the corrupt nature of the instruments of law, the arduous near impossibility of finding our own land upon which to convene our own civilization, and we are currently hampered by many wrongs within this system of enslavement and brutality just as bad or worse than the crime of this regime of fluoridation without knowledge and consent of even ONE person who is involved, with the direct result that many are harmed regardless of their knowledge or consent!

But because this condition endures where the Good are forced to coexist with the evil and stupid and nasty and brutish, due to sharing these reprehensible bodies and their living environments, then WE who are Divine in Heritage with all the rights and freedoms, virtues and responsibilities, are being targeted by an evil scheme of abuse which is known and designed by evil minded oligarchs who administer over a worldly mob of ignorant and unspiritual serfs, a significant proportion of which are of the vilest character no less than are the vast majority of those in the higher echelons of the oligarchy, and we have no recourse in the world or anywhere on it, above it, or below it.  We are crying out to our Fatherly and Motherly Divine Parents to save our very Spirits and even their Souls with them, and insofar as it is possible, even their bodily aspects until they could be relinquished under the Good Graces of the Care of Our Own.

We CONSCIOUSLY KNOW we are in this situation, and are open to any Remedy of the Divine, collective or personal, no matter whether within our own personal scale or on any scale, even that of every cosmos which exists all the way up to the Primal Ancestor of All. And we will take no sham offers from hierophantic charlatans, nor deranged pseudosages.

A crime like this is the greatest crime, and it is the most secret crime in the world, right under everyone's noses, every day, everywhere you go, this Crime Against Divine Men and Women, who are Noble by Nature, do not consent to conducting villainy upon others by any means or for any reason, and want to live together, in Peace, perpetually free from any villains of deception, fraud, robbery and murder, no matter what the consequences which attend that Separation.

But we can't even get the common troglodyte to get properly involved in the issue of the crime of fluoridation, so I'm not HOLDING MY:BREATHE to find out about the day that "All Mankind Ascends to Higher Consciousness".... No!  I know that day could never come in this world, and that this world's END cannot be prevented because its corruption runs so deep it is unavoidable, in ANY universe, that it will collapse with GOD's BLESSING!!

But I believe that God is on the side of those who Truly Love Truth, and that when this is all over and forgotten it is only THESE WHO LOVE TRUTH who can have any chance of Truly Loving IN Truth, only these haven any chance of "Ascending" or "Being Saved", because only they can Live Together Peacefully as Complete and Honest Persons.  And if Heaven is populated with any type of Being it must hospitable to only THIS kind of Person. Only those who cannot resonate to THIS Truth, or who WILL not, need be concerned about ANY Fate!





Philosophical Addendum:

*Note: A great deal of empirical evidence and cogent argument which dovetails with what I've written here, supports it, or finds confirmation within it, can be found here.

• Because the nature of any crimes of a temporal and material nature owe their possibility for their existence to the pre-existing facts of inethicality in their perpetrators, and this is owing to a pre-existing fact of immorality in the perpetrators, then it is found to be the worst sort of immorality and inethicality when perpetrated as a temporal and material crime, and is also found to be a crime in itself and the greatest crime, for it is the mother of all crimes that such inethicality and immorality exist even if they don't precipitate into any material harms! The evil spirit which actualizes this into deeds which leads to directly temporal and material harms is the evil minded spirit which has chosen to capitalize on the unfortunate fact that in a world such as this, bodies and their souls being as they are, there is a greater liklihood of getting away with such evils than there is in being safe from them, and so their deliberate evil is all the worse since they feel assured of protection in doing their deeds, and because their victimization patterns guarantee that no matter what happens there will be innocent victims who have every right to be spared such harms, and who's acquired karma of a negative sort is due more to the environments of these karmic events and the bodies existing as purportedly moral instruments within those environments, than from any innate culpibility, which in fact is a GOOD one.  Indeed, it is found that without these innocent victims then these crimes would not be so rewarding, as it gives for the "purest" suffering upon which the evil-minded truly feed on a metaphysical level.

• The Fundamental Nature of Wisdom, Power, and Sincerity are such that when manifested in issues of interaction where any resources are at stake, finite or infinite, then Honest Justice is always the Highest Principle of Civil Conventions of any kind.  This automatically rules out any deception, and of course any fraud which always depends upon deception. It presumes Good Moral Agents are all parties to the Civil Contract, and it presumes that clear and objective standards of fairness and proper symmetry in all relations are rightly expected and adhered to by all parties without prejudice to anyone's other inalienable rights.  Therefore, while Generosity is a Primordial and Divine Virtue, its exercise does not permit me to abrogate someone else's right to be properly decisive concering whether or not the generous deed will take place, and naturally this requires that they be fully informed to their own satisfaction as to all the consequences and effects of receiving such help, to include any possible harms which may ensue (even as "side effects"), and finally must always have their right to decide respected and observed in all actions of the agent which proposed, and to always have the right to renegotiate or reject such offers, or rescind them altogether wherever there is evidenced a breach in morality, ethics, or civility by the proposer, not only but especially when such breaches lead to harms which either were not anticipated, lack of benefits which were proposed, or harms which were underappreciated before being experienced directly.

• So if there are this many protetions afforded a Person against the actions of another in a JUST society, then how can it be imagined that the perpetrator of an unjust act can be protected by any designation of authority under any mandate whatsoever?  If even God would object, how can such an objection ever be overruled?  If the victim of such an act objects that is already enough, but what if God is a victim through the harm done to His and Her Progeny, the Spirit imprisoned within the bodies which must undergo such injustices in a world whose "justice system" is probably the most absurd and laughable institution which could possibly exist in any universe, by the consideration of ANY logic, even its own!  Complete HYPOCRISY rules this world and its so-called "institutions" which are merely the instituting of greater frauds than could have otherwise been possible without them.

• No one can reasonably expect anyone in any system of society to expect less than such fair, equitable and symmetrical conditions of co-existence which demand at the very least  a clear and unbreachable standard of INFORMED DECISION to be equally held over the actions of all actors in the system!  There cannot be privileged digressions from this standard for anyone, for any reason!  This is guaranteed by the simple fact that anyone consenting to such treatment puts themselves unduly at the mercy of abusers, which is never necessary, and no one who would perpetrate such an abuse would not want to be perfectly protected from such abuses.  But even if they themselves wouldn't mind living in a world where people were mutually exposed to abuse without recourse to Justice, this is not something which can be justly foisted upon anyone else without their full knowledge and free decision, along with all other reserved rights!  Moreover, even if it were possible to act this way, it cannot be complained by such a perpetrator that others will take suitable actions to protect themselves from such abuses, with just prejudice against any of the perpetrators assumed rights under any civil conventions to which he, apparently, was merely a pretender!

• So it is not a question of IF such crumbling facades must finally collapse, but merely a question of "in what way", to include for each person a "where" and a "when".  Since it can be shown that the only sort of corruption which could be responsible for such egregious and hideous crimes as coercive fluoridation is systemic corruption, with no formal or legal recourses which can be expected to bring justice since they must go through channels which are part of that very systematic corruption which they would seek to correct, then it must be that only a complete dismantling of said corruption by the removal of all presumed powers by all those involved in such organized crime, their formal arrest, and being charged in courts where their buddies cannot protect them with further corruption and criminal actions of bribery and threat.  But since I cannot foresee this being done in this world under the direction of any human agents, especially not with the huge sea of incompetent, negligent, and complicit plebes who would have to be involved to ensure its success, such a correction must come from POWERS which are beyond those we commonly understand to exist in our sham world of physicality.  These Transcendental Powers are not going to be stopped or prevented in any way.  They will carry through the required Justice, and it can be expected to come at any time, given the conditions of the world in which we live, where these very egregiously foul crimes are being commited, not the least of which is coercive fluoridation, but includes a great many other crimes which synergize their evils together so that each systematically supports the others, many of which would either equal or surpass this crime in scope and villainy, and against which all these same arguments would apply, as well as the Eschatological Prognoses of a Severe Divine Intervention.

Worldy Comedy vs Divine Comedy

"Success is the enemy of comedy"...  It just shows how comedy is in a position of submission to the tragic, and the lords of tragedy accept such an arrangement, because in this case the spirit of a man must play their fool.  

Comedy rarely commits itself to observations of the sort of TRUTH which brings any significant response from those with power in this world.. rarely.  But it is barely on the cusp of doing so, but still avoids the direct truth.  But Carlin was willing to "go there", and Louis C.K. is on the edge of "going there".  But those who truly go there, aren't usually truly "successful".   Hence, the persistence of a balance between "success" and "comedy".  

But is it because, as Seinfeld implies, that with too much success comedy can no longer hold the image of revealing any truth with authenticity?  The real reason is this:  Comedy must go around the Truth in order to be successful.  Its "success" is measured in how close it comes to the truth without really baring it out for everyone in such a way as to attract the "grim and humorless" powers that be.  

If it is "too successful" at revealing any Truth, it becomes "unsuccessful" because it will not be accepted by the "judging mob".  Comedy, in the end, sells out to the mob.  It is just that part of the "political debate" which is humorous, then prolonged into "an act".  These are politicians, who happen to be funny enough that they decided rather to influence people by persuasion rather than by force... but in the end, they are within the parameters of those who use force, or they are not going to be successful.  Because that force does not accept being disrespected.

The evil forces which hold sway over this material world, and who physically manage it, use coercion and deception, and arrange for the detriment and downfall of anyone who doesn't OBEY them, yet claim to the faces of those they manipulate that "all is fair"...  How can this be ignored as "just the way it is"?  Only by surrendering to it, and for all its rebellion to "the powers that be" that many comedians seem to manifest, they never really go in for "the kill", which is to take stand on something that will upset their audience.  Their audience, the mob, is all that protects them from tptb, or gives them a living.  They must cater to the audience.  This is true for all performing arts and it would go without saying, except here it must be said because this means they obey the audience.

They require the audience to identify with them or they will not present a joke, because the objective of the joke is to entertain.  If the audience isn't entertained, it is over.  "Off with his head" is now "bombing a show".  This is a pure form of submission, to seek to avoid such disapproval.  It is what is always avoided, even if the shtick is that "your approval is not required".  In the end that is just an act at best.  No one goes on stage just to bomb unless that person has a suicidal mentality.  This is why there are no "Gnostic Comedians" in this world.  For we see in the world a MORAL ABSURDITY which is a real tragedy, and this cannot be laughed away as the afterthought of finding in life, as Seinfeld puts it "The torture which makes one happiest".

But that its exactly what the world requires of those who are an "accepted part" of it.  To be a part of it, one must authorize its having such a hold over one's mind that one would buy into it even if all it had to offer was torture, and so one accepts the major condition, on the minor condition of hoping to be accommodated in seeking the form of torture which makes one most happy (or least sad).  Such a mealy-mouthed surrender, from a moral standpoint.  

The idea of morality is merely a pittance of thought if it must be doled out in terms of surrendering to prevalent norms, especially if those are ensconced in a world of petty and faux nobility or else the false alternative of a broodingly ignorant mob, who don't want to be confronted with any REAL truth, as that would disturb the personality masks they are wearing all day every day.

Because some of us happen to know about the methods of coercion being used, and we know the great MORAL STAIN which is upon those who engage in such perversions.  We know about the things kept in the dark, and GOD Knows. So this sort of thing is too uncomfortable for a comedian to broach seriously, because it wouldn't be funny to do so.  This is beyond their reach.  A comedian cannot touch vital truth in the end, because if he did, he'd lose most of his audience immediately, because nor can they.

So the comedy of this world, just like the tragedy of it, is absurd, because all comedy does is round out the rough edges of the tragedy of this world's by observing its absurdity, but bringing it into focus in such a way that any tensions about it are "settled out of court".  People are expected to "have an understanding".  Understandings such as "things could be worse" or "we all know what goes on behind closed doors" or "think about it, but don't say it", and we are supposed to laugh that "Yes, ideally I would say something, but in this case I wouldn't.  What an ass anyone is who thinks they are really brave, because no one really is that brave", and yet they are "all together in this", so in this big support group they have formed everyone can feel a sudden burst of identification that normal human contact does not permit widely, and so this creates a zone where there is a sudden release of tension about "some really dark shit" as a comedian might observe.  They can broach even the most heinous subjects as long as somehow, we are all "in this together, so what are we going to do about it?" and so we can release that sense of moral tension and just "let it go".  These and other sorts of stock phrases are usually the heading under which comedic material is presented.

In the end, it is the "slap on the back" of a "good" car salesman ("hash tag" oxymoronic).  And over the worse possible things one could be so phony about, such as the human condition, the nature of life and death, god the universe and everything, etc.  It is such a lame duck quality in human beings, this "sense of humor".   But the real irony of all this is that people who are truly moral and have a serious attitude about honesty and sincerity, and who despise deception, but who are treated as that which is to be pitied by the world (at best), in other words LOVERS OF TRUTH , also have a "sense of humor".  It is reserved for laughing at evil in its face, it is reserved for praising rightness and innocence in the face of what demeans, and it makes no apology for hurting the feelings of any audience, no matter how large or how "powerful".  It points out what is absurd for the pure moral satisfaction that comes with that, and for no other motive.  Laughter is just an unintended side effect.

The title had nothing to do directly with Dante's Inferno, but here are the rough equations for your perusal and consideration:

   Worldy Comedy =  (Absurdity x (-1/Morality^Rhetorical Deception))

   Divine Comedy =  (Absurdity x (1/Morality^Truthful Observation))

Both can work on exactly the same material, but must go about it in different ways, and these ways matter which can raise by degrees of power the meaningful spiritual impact of those observations of the world over which they supervene.  The nature of "Morality" is completely determined to be two utter antivalent orientations about Truth and Justice on the one hand and Goodness and Beauty on the other.  The attitudes are aligned along the axis where the Soul/Spirit meets the bodies of flesh/emotion/ego.  

That which is "Worldly" in nature seeks to make peace with the world's corruption and to "make the most of a bad thing" (to paraphrase Seinfeld's point about finding a vocation in life), while paying lip service to the idea that it should be "better than all this" but without any real commitment to "stirring the pot".

That which is Divine is that nature which seeks to make utter war with the world's corruption, to reject the bad utterly and seek the Good in purity, making no apologies for this.  If you have to apologize for it, or feel you have to, then you have done wrong and not right.

The laughter comes from the absurd notion that any other stand could be worth taking.  It is a laughter of release from evil, a sense of pure freedom in KNOWING that:  This world is A COMPLETE FARCE that has no power over me, but pretends to have all power over me.  It is a COSMIC JOKE about a very serious matter, and it is TOTALLY LAUGABLE to imagine for an instant that we can be persuaded otherwise.  At the crossroads of morally evaluating the world and our place in it we have found that the world cannot be taken seriously, and so we must laugh at its silly antics at trying to gain our serious attention because it thinks we think we are a body at their behest.  It is amazingly DUMB.

Imagine a world that PRETENDS TO BE A WORLD.  A giant "Truman Show", where everyone is TOTALLY FAKING IT, and their only major goal is to get you to believe it is genuine when it is not.  It is a giant practical joke of the general and commonplace corruption and falsehood over the particular and rare virtue and truth.  It is a massively EVIL LIE that deserves to be mocked all day long and with all one's might, and certainly not with any eye to entertaining IT.  But rather, to the contrary: to entertain our own minds to a view proper for the subject we wish to evaluate, and to enable our conscience the release of the tension of possibly going along with the world in its ways, or even seeming to.

Even when it comes to laughter:  WE ARE NOT ALL ONE

A Note on Unrequited Love

Sometimes unrequited love is quite beautiful, especially when both parties are mature about it, and have acted graciously.  There is never any need for cruelty when both parties are  mature and respectful, nor any need for changing any feelings (but the need to change some expectations and intentions).

In the case of brain function and architecture, it seems that nature is efficient for our purposes only when we delimit its impulses toward some more refined goal-seeking behavior.  The problem is that our purposes are usually "duct taped" onto primary urges as their sloppy diplomatic gesture to the world or "objective reality" in request of being fulfilled as some desire.  

That might remind us of the Daoists who claimed that it is man's artificiality that is the problem, and that because it was not derived from a virtuous sincerity. Our methods were clumsy and inefficient because our motives were not as pure as they ought to have been for the circumstances of our actions.  (Some good academic discussion on this topic is here)

Aristotle reminds us that True Friendship (friendship par excellence and in epitome) involves a bond between two persons of genuine virtue.  Many people claim the office of friendship, but they are entitled to that claim no more than their proper claim to virtue allows.  And the truly virtuous will assign their libido last place in life, and assign their development of character first place. And only by this is sublimation truly possible.  The hypocrisy of suppressed feelings is also merely a sort of ineffectual duct taping over the the truth.

Unrequited love, when held respectfully in the heart, is a treasure unto itself.  If one has such feelings, and they are genuine, then it is likely they will be detected by the other.  Sometimes they develop for a lack of knowing significant things about the other, such as their relationship with someone else.  In that case, a revelation about that will be inevitable and if that love was respectful, it will not unduly encroach.  These things can be felt and intuited.  In this case there is no need to be harsh, just as the other was not being crudely demonstrative.  People might sometimes be unsympathetic to their suitors, but to be cruel or evil in rebuffing or manipulating is hideous.

Unrequited love of this kind is sublime, is undying and of inherent value, and has a benign effect on both parties when allowed to be what it is without unduly acerbic treatment.  If the friend zone can be gracefully achieved by those two people, then it is proof that the love was in no way wasted, as the person loved was worth loving as a person, as a friend, and also that they have integrity.  It is unfair to expect integrity for feelings which they may even have toward you (not requited love, but consonant feeling), but not to expect integrity for feelings they have for someone else.  It is perversely selfish in that case.  If they are willingly bound to another person, even for reasons we dismiss as "not right for their best interests", then it is not necessarily endearing to persist in directly feeding one's own gracious behavior into the scene as a form of persuasive contrast qua intervention.  That has to be done very subtly and without any sense of pushiness.  But better, with some mature sense of the danger involved in pursuing a person who has a vested interest in what seems to be an unhealthy relationship.  Their reactions to the advertisement of feeling from an unwanted suitor (or even a suitor they might find desirable), is not likely to be healthy either.

But when the both parties are mature, and it is a case of the chips falling the one way rather than the other. a gracious demeanor about the whole thing, from both sides, allows for a friend/colleague zone which makes the memory of both persons to each other to be a pleasant one.  There is not necessarily a demand that the third party to the couple change his feelings about his loved one.  It is just that, in the case where such feelings cannot be returned, the third party must reasonably change his expectations, or risk running aground on the rocks of delusion and insult.

From Determinism to Agency in the Great Mind Machine, with Two Separate Destinies in One Fate

If creative activity can be so heavily automated, almost even beyond need of inspiration itself (you can quickly try things and change them to taste, no need to firmly pre-envision anything...).  So all that discipline out of the way, you take your theoretical wings (literal and metaphorical), and fly beyond the limits of the average peasant who carved out a flute 900 years ago.  Now if humans can find and automate almost everything but the "creative spark" itself, and if this can be done to a high enough level so that its relation to everyday men and women were technologically godlike enough, you could literally counterfeit an entire world, INSIDE the physical hosts of that species (humans), and to them it would be as different from fantasy and make-believe as anything could be.  Their entire psychobiological reference point is zeroed out on a barely believable story!  Once that is "rock bottom", you can only believe more iterations of that same basic self-contradictory insanity.

Therefore so much can be manipulated without others even knowing it was manipulation in the first instance, when it was begun, and in the last instance, when its purpose is achieved.  In neither case is the targeted mark every truly let in on this "secret" (New Age bestsellers whining to the contrary), although there is an aspect of the mechanism where there is a hierarchy of cons and marks.  The majority of beings are some proportion of both, then at the "bottom" of their heap are those (the Light Beings) who must bear the full brunt of anything gained by the rest all the way up to the "top" of this pyramid scheme (as it is by definition and form simultaneously), and they must only find their salvation FROM this world. It is simply the way it is on the very face of it.  But those who exist within the realm of the demonic, the "con/marks", they are all struggling in their fantasy land where it is "noble" to challenge each other in some sort of pretense of divinity and honor (think "Game of Thrones", barf, then come back, this will wait).

This is not even a secret to them, because they live this way and glorify it, just look at history.  But the point is that it is all wrong, that the whole thing, the whole project of this world, from the ground up, is a joke, a mistake, and error, a sin, a  monstrosity.  In the end, it cannot end well for it.  But what of those who had no stake in it from the beginning, or who during a period of undeserved Grace found the Light by some Miracle of a spark of it which lay in them, and became inducted into the realm of fully Conscious, Perfectable Beings.   And it remains only for those to be finalized one way or another, which surely anyone can see happening every day, and it could be drawn out of them in a courtroom, you wouldn't have to be Socrates, and yet they cannot see it because they refuse to, so that on the Last Day when it is unveiled, it will blast them mightily.  Therefore doesn't obstinate practice accumulate a directly proportional cure?  It does.

But this is not the plan of the world.  It is the plan concerning the world by those beyond it.  Not those who think they are beyond it, but are merely precariously balanced on the top of its heap (which to Those Above it is the bottom, hence the first shall be last and the last shall be first, but only as a once and final switch at the end...).  Did you rake it in during this world's facade?  Did you profiteer from suffering, even in the form of merely mitigating your own?  Did you do so wittingly or unwittingly?  Did you or did you not repent from this?  Did Grace not shine on you?

So if someone showed Good Faith they would inevitably look at the world and see it for the farce it is.  It is inevitable. So that means the world has acted in bad faith, and not one single shred of what it obligates is enforceable upon the Spirit of God.  And that soul which is bound to flesh and Spirit of God both, is obligated only to choose one of these two masters, Spirit or body, God or world of mirages, and that is all.  There simply is no office in the world which has claim over my very soul, unless I grant that authority.  That must be tried and tested, and finally proven one way or the other over a sufficient number of life experiences, sure enough.  But at some point it must be proven one way or the other.  Which side gains from the time it took to find this out among them depends, in that one case, on which way that soul goes in the end.  But in the END of the whole process, only one side gains from this when it Ends, and only one side gains by that End being eternally delayed.  The side that gains from its ENDING is the Good Side.

Only They can endure the end of all things, and are fit to survive them or even to manifest them at will, not those things which depend upon these beings, in the end, for sustenance, being themselves cut off from True and Fresh Light, and themselves overly-glutted with their own recycled imitation reality, and thereby suffering under a terminal consumption. They have no recourse but to end up begging at the door, at the very feet of those they placed, spiritually, at the lowest rank in their dominions.  Yet, this proves the point, in the End.  Only what makes it to that End and survives it will matter, or could matter.  But it is rest assured, matter itself will not, nor anything which depends upon it for its form for expression.

So in genuine humility, we of the Light seek our own redemption, each one regardless of rank or origin, covering itself up in the same wretched vestments, and we do this for each other, not for the world.  The world has lost any taste for such things anyway, even for the sake of play-acting and mockery.  We are in a new and final age of evil's pathetic desperation, and it will come in any convenient form for a scrap.  Be therefore MORE, and not LESS stingy in terms of Spiritual Energy, and let the chips fall wherever they may for the issue of the Truth.  It is out there and everywhere and if someone has a good excuse for missing it, it is for better Minds and Judges to determine.  Face value is starting to become the New Inflation, since illusion is collapsing at cosmological rates, transformations occurring far beyond comprehension of any measure calculable in this universe.  Make firm your decision about that End, now.  THAT is the "power of now", and not some other nonsense the New Age fools have leaked out into the world.  They can try and put a New Age spin on this too if they want, but this is where the buck stops.  These two essences go separate ways, and do not become one, never were one, and are not one, now.  That information is also contained in the powerful nowness that is, which is the fact of the ought, which does not collapse herein, but creates it out of the tension of its duality.

But this duality, it cannot End well for one side, but cannot go on well for the other, unless that going on facilitate in fact its hastened and perfected End.  So both have something in common, a common direction in appearance, within the world (both tout "virtues" for example, as I outlined at outset), but in the END of that is only divergence tending straight to pure antivalence.  This will only End badly for the false, and only Perfectly Well for the True.  Right has cast Its Glorious Might in realms inconceivably higher than this one we see.  See this world as the last domino in a long series of them, which cannot but fall upon one another in prescribed ways, and which manipulations by Grander and Better minds cannot be avoided.  All that can be decided is in which directly one Truly goes, when all appearances are cast aside. THAT Pure Truth is the Sword of Truth become Justice.

Misopedic Undertones

Men are not allowed to stand somewhere at random, and smile warmly at a beautiful sight.  It is "gay" or at the very least "kooky and strange", perhaps even SUSPCIOUS.  These pettish fools with their quaint suspiciousness, looking to play the peasant in some spaghetti western who shields children's faces from the evil glare of the dark-suited and mustachioed villain pistolero.  Yeah, that's me.  That's why children light up when they see me.  It is my villainous demeanor, no doubt.  That's why over time they feel life is a drag being with their own families, and why they will grow to literally hate the guts of some of these people who "truly love them".  It's because I smiled at them and discoursed with them.  But what it really is is petty jealousy.  Adult egos want love and attention, but are black holes incapable of receiving any unless it feeds their attachments and fantasies.  So they'll be damned if "beautiful day" is a pretext for "smiling child", not at the behest of a... oh no look out...  a *stranger*.  Perhaps "beautiful birds in the tree" is also taboo, if only you stand alone smiling about it?  How odd, such a "THREAT LEVEL" here.   Oh yes, let's get those iPhone's out and look on, suspiciously...

But then again, neither much are women allowed to do that.  It is a kind of hatred of the soul which indicates a prevalent "misopedia".  Being inwardly focused and happy is not cool.  What is cool is having a story for yourself at every second that "fits in" with some prefabricated array of "mentos moments" scripted for every encounter, and the willingness to participate in such "on demand". This is the world of "making apologies" just for existing.

But to show positive Spiritual features?  If they are harmless and universally understandable as benign, this is now an offense? Indeed, to smile warmly at a child, or to be particularly friendly with them "on their level" (which is a beautiful and sincere level), is treated as a sign of... "pedophilia", which ought to have meant a love of children (or of what is beautiful in and of them). And have you seen the effect it has on children to treat endearment toward them like a threat?  Have you seen them wither?  Did you ever see them blossom?  No, the parental guardian unit who sees, directed toward any child whether their own or not, supervised or not, any affection or kindness which does not fit in neatly with some fantasized "norm", thinks it has a divine and natural duty and obligation to look upon such things suspiciously and with a sense of concern for the safety of the child, and to be concerned about the sanity or "threat level" of the adult.  This is how utterly insane people are in this "world", or globe of dust littered with insane fools. 

The whole Jesus-in-velvet market thrives partly on scenes of Jesus adoring and being adored by children.  How odd that is.  Yet no one gets up in arms about how strange it is that priests are having their way with children.  The same for teachers, and others who are in some uniform of authority.  They have not time for those extremes.  The criminal is YOU who don't have enough fame or power to buy off their opinion of you, you who were not elected into the limelight of sheeple love.  And who would receive that but a perverse zoophile?

And it is a not so subtle misopedia which underlies all of this gender war business.  While men and women bicker at each other, children are treated like objects.  

It has even become "funny" to be misopedic, as George Carlin and Louis C.K. have proven.  Carlin took out his misanthropy squarely on children in a very directed and vitriolic attack in his own material, and it had great success for him with his audiences.   Indeed, Louis C.K. took it further by brutalizing the images of his own children for comedic effect.  Just do a youtube search of their names and "children" and you'll see for yourself.  The foibles of humanity fester above, and the acidic wastes which flow from them drip gratuitously upon the heads of the innocent.  With human society like this, who needs demons in the invisible ethers?

It is "strange" to manifest Good Spiritedness.   And people of either gender generally don't have any genuinely Good Spiritedness.  Humanity's problems run this deep, down to gender identity, only because they run so much deeper than even that, into the metaphysical realms of spiritual identity.  And if this is the sort of problem humanity is hung up with, count me out of the wretched mess.  Count me out of any society that acts this way.  I've no use for it.  You, "society", can "do you".  When finally the Judge who brings an end to this cosmic farce opens the door for those whom you rejected, you will be left alone in the darkness of empty and cold nothing, in the jaws of a dragon as its food, living in terror your final eons with others of your own kind.  You'll all "do you" with no Spiritual Beings to mock.  We'll be in world where we can be ourselves.

Artists, Freedom of Expression, and Sincerity under Eschatology

Yet they have a lot of things to say for or against this man, and claim strange things about him "that he is a brand" or that he is a scam artist at heart or some other cynical notion.  Yet they themselves have not shown us how to properly go about doing anything important in life.  These odd people know who they are.  They are poltergeists, nothing more.  A look at the comment section of that video will show you what sort of people the world manifests around people who "make waves".

I have a bit of criticism by way of his methods and his actions.  It is simply this:  What do we gain by confronting the world?  We gain nothing IN the world, but we confront the world's hypocrisy by our sincerity.  It is fine to do this in a major and political way, if that is what you are inspired to do.  But it would be irresponsible to even suggest that this is the final and greatest sum of Spiritual Rebellion from the world.  Even a brutal and evil person can take a major and controversial position which gets him into trouble with more major powers of the world.  It is not enough, or in itself worthy, to have gone against the grain of the world in THIS way.  This is a matter of expression and circumstance, or even of fate, not of Spirit per se.  If the debauched and worldly Billy Connoly can say what he likes about religion, the various affairs of the world, and make religion look properly like crap, then doing that is no longer a sign of Spiritual Sense per se anymore.  It is only a sign that even the man in the street can see this truth now.  But what about the Ultimate and Spiritual Truth?  This is what they may have yet to grasp.  It is what they may never grasp (do they seem to be grasping for it?).  But that is their affair, and not ours.  

My point is simply that the "real way" of doing this Spiritual Expression is not necessarily expressed in such massively visible forms in the first place, if at all.  How you concentrate and breath alone, or parse your own thoughts and judgments, or do daily deeds in your own life, can reflect Great Sincerity which the world will only insult and never recognize.   But the whole IDEA of Religion is that there is a Greater Spirit which DOES recognize it, and under the Grace of THAT Divinity a Spiritual Person may walk any path in the world and be saved from its evil and be sealed away, as a Pure Spirit.  The point is that we don't have to let visible, highly staged dramas dictate our understanding of the world and our place in it, even though the world has set these ostensible passion plays up for our ingestion as a collective web of propaganda.

But this cannot be realized by those who think worldly exploits define the curvature of Spiritual Progress, when it does not, and is a realm of massive fraud and counterfeiting.  And so of course Ai Wei Wei attracts those types of criticisms because they are built into the very fabric of the world's black market of self-expression.  But he is showing to the Western world the brutal nature of a more "hands on" dictatorship style, although he is grounding his perceptions on personal experiences.  He is asking himself, "should I be like that man who stood in front of the tank in Tian An Men"?  But what sort of tank?  What sort of standing?  I think he wants to express himself as an artist with a sense that his art can be a pure expression of his sincerity.   It seems a legitimate motivation for his actions.  It may be quite a Spiritual Expression in his case if in  his own life he is a Righteous Man before God.  That is not for miscreants to judge.  

But the world is crawling with miscreants who are ever ready to judge others down to the level of their own limited, evil size of soul.  They cannot understand even the remote possibility of a Sincere Spirit, although they use those words on their own lips in cynical conformation with ethical codes and their parlance.  So now we have the issue of what counts as an expression of Spirit in a world which has a false normality and a large groundswell of demonic mobs of ignorant miscreants.  What sort of world can be like this and meaningfully sustain Spiritual Expression?  It can't.  It can only persecute it, and all the while COUNTERFEITING it because of coveting its Glory, but finding in the end that it only has value in attracting people under a locus of control using symbols of excessive significance, but which have meaning only for the Truly Spiritual. Yet these True Spirits are turned off by all those attracted to such false spirituality.  So they go and form their own Spiritual Communities.  Then history shows what the demonic mobs do about that.  Then they exist in a handful here and there only.  

When that day comes, then the world is about to take a massive dirt nap, as in, God will have no further purpose for it, since after this round, no savable Spirits will exist.  All imprisoned Light is inert, all souls are nothing but simulacra of expressions they did not and cannot authenticate, and all Spirits will have been removed who were worthy under God's Grace.  Then what to do with the world?  Anything and everything is possible, but basically, it will be dragged toward the Light of heaven very slowly, so it will flatten itself out to avoid that Light which burns them, and they will create the broadest possible space, spread out over the totality of Heaven, like a transparently black invisibility, which will thin itself down to some limit, and then when pressed at some infinity, it will congeal into one oblivion, eternally rubbed out of Existence for Eternity.

Guide all your actions with this process in view, not only your "social, political, outwardly noticeable" expressions.  Sometimes, it is not best for you to go head to head with some egotistical fools.  Why test God's Grace?  For what reason?  What if the cynics are right and you have gotten pompous or looking for a buck?  Then if they ARE correct then you happen to have a problem in that God's Grace does not well cover such things as egotism.  They may be correct about it in some way or to some degree, though they only correct when it is true, not because they know it is true, because they must accuse even when it is untrue, that is part of their job given them by the demons who stir this stew called "the world".  They usually start accusing the very instant it is conceivable by the greatest stretch of the imagination, that someone has some evil at bottom of whatever they do or express.  That's their "opener".  So their credibility as "evil detectors" is proportionately weak.  Then look at what they let pass for proper authority and acceptable history, and if you disagree they just say "let's move on and why are you so paranoid".   So these creatures are clearly NOT SPIRITUAL in nature, but are known as "illusions".  Artificially intelligent organism.

  But the Moral Spirit cannot be generated out of such organisms, but is confined into association with them, but will no yield its Energy to what is false.  So the false person (ego) and the conjunction between the two (the "soul") was generated so that energy could be taken from this Spirit a bit at a time, by much deception.

  This being done, the expressions of everything, EVERYTHING of the Spirit, came only from the Spiritual Beings entrapped in matter, and the other material beings (and the bodies of the Spiritual Beings) all dilute those expressions through distributed assimilation and imitation.  The world has mimicked and amplified its mimicry to look like a giant stage which makes the drama of REAL Spiritual suffering look like "just anybody's suffering" and it takes the genuine expressions of Spiritual Beings and tries to translocate them into lesser beings who are inhabited by demons (popes, priests, political leaders, entertainment stars, major personalities, artists, scientists, etc etc).  These people are a mass of such "stolen inspiration" which is taken out of the creativity of the True Ones and distributed through mimicry over the ages, and redistributed to the control of demonically possessed meat bags.  How's that for a world you can Spiritually Express yourself in?  It isn't.  But True Religion CANNOT BE MIMICKED.  Sincerity, by definition, cannot be mimicked or copied.  It can only be expressed HONESTLY.

This is the Sign by which the Truly Spiritual are known, and it can save only Them from the world who have that Sign.

That's why Kongzi (Confucius) said, basically, that you should learn from the faults of others and correct yourself.  This doesn't mean that others don't have faults, otherwise, how could you notice them?  It also doesn't mean that you shouldn't Judge those faults, otherwise how could you Deem them not worthy of your own Spirit?  If the Spirit is in you, it would be grieved at that, surely you must Judge it, that it would grieve your Spirit if you were to do such a thing?  If not, then "Judge not" makes no sense.  But with this way of understanding it, in the context of the world, its beginning, and its end, we can see with clearer eyes the real meaning of "judge not".  These quotes can be read for further challenges, to see if they can be interpreted in some way that is harmonious with the Spirit, and if not, in what way.