Pressing for Truth in an Evil Morass of Lies

Finally, a choice of professional journalists who tell the sort of Truths, and bring into intelligent discussion the sort of information that most have been afraid to even admit to themselves in private, and with all the straight forward elegance that faux media can only aspire to imitate. It's a great accompaniment to the cultural commentator who tries to ensure that undeniable Truth is exposed with all the invective it deserves, but avoids the perils of reducing the phenomena of corruption into one stereotyped format that prevents people of all walks from looking at it and facing it by being turned off by labels. Face it, getting past the label "conspiracy theorist" and reaching the deserved status of an honest person facing facts telling truth, that was almost like Sisyphus getting the rock over the hump. Why worsen it with frontal assaults that use too many hot button terms which would prevent people from hearing the salient message about what is undeniably in need of facing and correcting in the world. Going from the empirical evidence first, and demonstrating the contradictions which are drawn immediately from it second, allows the for the attention of people who are already short on clarity but who might be receptive if certain counter-Truth terminology "buzz words" are avoided. If they really are implicated, those who cannot be more directly named (whomever they are), then they will be connected to this news by these facts and their implications just like a bad sweater is connected one end to the other by one thread. But if this process doesn't address the covert control grids that reinforce the overt ones, then plausibility of the reality of the former will not help us understand the absurdity of the latter. If people don't realize that the spell which they are under is impacting them so heavily because it is catalyzed by forces which are not at all visible then they'll have, for once, a nationwide expose of something which addresses a Truth that deep within them they already sense and suspect, and which would simultaneously bring REASON AND SENSE to their condition, while also refreshing their attention upon those absurdities of the world and its problems which shouldn't even be happening in the first place, much less receiving so little attention on such a large scale that someone who will report on it has to push through decades of censorship and concerted psychological warfare attacks (to which so many succumb). The simultaneous manifestation of the content that was before psychologically invisible, with also the cause of its being rendered psychologically invisible, will make it all so much more clear to people. While I subscribe to Occam's Razor on this issue, I believe it is shaving past the skin if these follicles are missed. Just that if people truly love Truth, then this is peculiar Truth that, in all possible worlds accessible from this one, must be addressed, and which if it is not, would cause the exposure of absurd evils become a desirable and right goal which is then rendered absurdly difficult, if not impossible. Everyone does talk about the TRANCE STATE which is implicated in all this, but the etiology of this leaves out too much of the covert technological infrastructure's details of reinforcement to "break the spell" in this special way. Alex Jones approaches this topic, broaching it directly many times, but he it can only go so far if people will look at him, even with all they know, as being bat shit crazy. And that's saying a lot after what he's overcome in his career. But it stands even to the driest reasoning mind that if evil is really the "cosmic underdog" and if it is truly on its back leg, then with all its might it will find a strong point of defense which will optimize its outcome until it is finally knocked out. Helping Alex to do that job is the excellent work also conducted by his colleagues, such as David Knight, Anthony Gucciardi, Jakari Jackson, Paul Joseph Watson, Lee Ann McAdoo, Darrin McBreen, Rob Dew, Joe Biggs, so many behind the screen, and all the people who sincerely take an interest in the media and other good services that InfoWars team provides through their products intended to promote rather than destroy people, while those who have always criticized and maligned him and anyone else who would dare to look "behind the curtain" on their own initiative or on any initiative other than the one designated for them by criminals who are behind those curtains, they have dared to reverse the false narrative of these evil-minded cowards.  

As relevant today as 30 years ago, here's a sample of David Knight's work back in 2013, pertaining to inverted narratives, and which we may soon see in our own country as a result of corruption and cosmic inevitability, a form of which is being seen now in Europe, as well as in South America. Similar evils existing in Asia, all around the world, including Russia, at least are limited to some degree by a cult of honor, where covertly evil oligarchs up up a strong pretense of being aristocratic, and even like to hold that illusion up in front of their faces, to block the sight of the nearest broken mirror. Darrin McBreen has really held that mirror up to a high shine with this one. Would love to get the reverse speech in this expose. Anthony Gucciardi really nails it in this one. And while cowards may sometimes get the sneak attack on a tipsy Joe Biggs, they don't count as honorable foes anyhow, because they fail to realize when they attack the rider of bald eagles, they dance in chains like fools. Look at one expose of how corrupt people use disasters they foment with one hand, to justify tyrannical actions to be taken with the left hand. How dare they not consider this three-tour fighting U.S. Army combat veteran fair game for anything but a salute and cheer when he reminds us to be vigilant against unjust plots against our freedom, which plots are unjustly and malevolently projected at others than themselves by the real perpetrators (others referred to classically as "fall guys", "scape goats", and "fools and stooges"). And Jakari Jackson brings his level-headed tone and sardonic wit to the situation like a lone machine gun report on a smokey, desolate battlefield in his nightly news reports like this one. Here he has a Newz Blitz with Joe Biggs. Of course, look at the sort of foul stuff that was going on with respect to wrongful conduct by gun-toting, loud-mouthing jerks who happen to be wearing an image of authority which rightly belongs on a different breed of men than a growing percentage of those in the profession of law enforcement can claim to be, with each passing year (unless there has been a covert sea change of which I am unaware).

As that process unfolds it will be found that it increases a reliance upon covert technological and methodological enhancement of a status quo which, like other forms of counterfeit, rigged exchanges, hides the asymmetry relations behind the scenes which are professed, on the surface, to have been eliminated. This sort of scam of course must be uncovered directly or the scammer will always have the "how dare you accuse me without evidence" defense and the "you must be crazy to suggest such a thing" defense. That is overcome by Alex's methods of exposure of the basic facts of the past to the present day. David Icke broaches the historical and archaeological evidence, and the broad sociological mechanisms in a more focused way that brings out a large scale time-space tableaux to our attention, but leaves behind the immediacy of what can be deduced from direct evidence of current events when discussed simply in the context of a standing paradigm. Veteran's Today focuses upon the the same events and information, and from a variety of angles of approach, but hits heavier in the discussion of the clandestine subterfuge which underlies all of this information, especially the work of Preston James. I will give mention to Jeff Rense of Rense Real News and Matt Drudge of the Drudge Report for being welcome substitutes to the normal news presentation outlets, and even their headlines alone can often capture far more meaningfully the current situation than could digging through a pile of newspapers, even the best and most informative.
Some of their different emphases are controversial even among the set of those people who will consider them as worthy sources or clearinghouses of information, news, and analysis. Jones focuses on a certain stream of current political and cultural events which, combined with his addressing of the many absurd horrors going on which are factually occurring and which are absurdly called "conspiracy theories" (events are not all merely theories because just some, and not all theories are merely their own events). Analysis of local, national and global facts based upon what is immediately evident and which can be validly sussed out of the news, and which is couched in terms of acute historical vision and analyzed within a transparently admitted paradigm is his specialty. And his team and crew have broadened the overall scope of his presentation so that a full spectrum of viable media is growing in evidence with InfoWars leading as the "tip of the spear". David Icke has uncovered a lot of historical and cultural information, and given his own paradigmatic analysis, in his books and presentations which have gotten a large number of people to think at least broadly in right terms to help them reach a level of information which can help them follow their own instincts and natures to reach better cognitive and ethical decision-making skills. Icke also delivers some strong commentary on current events while in the overall demonstrating a masterful presentation of how to smoothly and coherently realize the way that heuristic paradigms like "problem, reaction, solution" help people visualize and understand what sort of confidence tricks are going on to make any level of fraud operational, whether in a small hamlet of a vast cosmos. He also indicates unabashed awareness of virulent and horrific evils, and reports on them bravely and integrates their analysis into a cultural history of their development. He steers a bit too much into rhetoric which borders on the New Age when he speaks of "love" and "oneness" as the ultimate answer, and I can't agree on this emphasis. The emphasis should be on LOVING TRUTH, and SEEKING JUSTICE. Those who truly do this will find their unity is with one another is simply a concomitant feature of their mentalities. But what they will not find is any oneness with those who oppose them in precisely this, and who also oppose awareness of their evil deeds, which Icke himself so expertly exposes. Preston James and Jeff Rense go full tilt in directions which Alex Jones does not emphasize or examine in much detail. Without deciding what that means about anyone, let's just suffice it to say that Organized Crime takes forms which are not much discussed by Jones but which are liberally discussed by Rense Real News and Veteran's Today, and which are in great need of being addressed all the more as they are so rarely or minimally discussed, if even somewhat occasionally, by Jones and Icke. I feel that Jones avoids the Zionist elephant in the room because he would like to address all the substantive issues that, if Zionists are in any proportion involved (or anyone else for that matter) would need people to have enough mainstream common sense to be able to understand the visible fabric of their world's falling apart at the seams in a variety of ways before such "taboo" issues could begin to be integrated past a very real firewall of cultural censorship. Icke will go into those issues more than Jones. Veteran's Today writers (who are not all of one accord) such as Preston James give a unique spin on these same pressing issues covered by the rest, but also go into matters such as Psychotronics and Covert Operations (covert civil war) which are not saliently addressed by Icke nearly as much, and by Jones even less so. But perhaps it is better for some to focus on the prosaic phenomena (which are very important and no less profound than the occult and seemingly outlandish), while others focus on the further inner anatomies of the evil's in this world. I've tried, for my part, to integrate all the facts and truths which are discussed by those whom I've just mentioned and many others, along with my own experiences and learning, into one synthesis that also addresses the layers of religious and philosophical dimensions and implications to all this data and discussion, and I've stated that it turns out that the Gnostic Religion, understood non-polemically, factually, and historically, according to the most ultimate understanding of the foundational elements which alone can integrate the human mind and the Divine Conscience into one unity concerning the fugue of absurdities and conflicts and horrors of our world (while also doing no injustice to the Beauty which was held in these evil domains as a wretched prisoner and slave), and have therefore also accounted for why certain religious and philosophical perspectives have arisen in the world and been persecuted, and who those persecutors fundamentally are, and what their methodologies must be, in all possible worlds. 

I have also outlined the implications and outcomes of all this so that all the data is integrated into one Understanding, all the evaluations are cogent with that understanding and in line with the only viable form of a Conscience which has any validity of judgement concerning this data, with all this left to the audience, however unlawfully and illegally, and otherwise illicitly constricted, to reach their own best judgement if they include the added dimension of The Gnostic Truth, which is maligned, misrepresented, censored, blocked, evaded, persecuted and yet Eternal and Evergreen just as the Divine Foundation upon which rest the realizations which are alone derivable from them, and which alone coincide with the implications of knowledge and ethics which I've said are intimately consistent with the best synthesis of the facts and truths understood of the world so that they congeal into one coherent paradigm of thought and action. 

That will at the same time resolve contradictions that attend the deeply related spiritual issues which cannot help but attend these matters with metaphysically demonstrable force that cannot afford to be ignored and also cannot afford to be ill-explained or addressed. I had done many videos in the past, but those have been set aside for a new approach that best integrates all that is going on now in the world, and according to the better fullness of understanding which cannot help but manifest and our physical minds the physical world gradually assent to full exposure of Truth Eternal. I will continue to do the best that I can to provide my own observations, commentary, teaching, and invective (and sometimes encouragement, who knows), all according to the program I outlined there on my channel, and this will have many new and concretely relevant developments. That is why, to mention one more person of note, I have taken pains in the past to deplore the cults of personality which form up in connection with these matters, and so have completely condemned as evil shills and covert psychological warfare assets the likes of those who would promote the New Ager Agenda or would propose false forms of Gnostic Truth while really only using it as a cover to ensnare others into their narcissistic agendas. Ditto concerning so-called "organized religion" which, in just about all forms, is detrimental to people, and is truly fraudulent in almost all cases. Know Wonder by examining the evils brought into the world and by whom, and examine their full historical and current conduct along with associated institutions of cultural control grid hegemonies, in order to understand "no wonder" that Real Religion had something distinctly counter to the earthly and human norms in the world and throughout its history, and so was behind all great movements of social ethics and against all tyrants. I recommend them all as a study on what a Real World must do without, and cannot do without, respectively.

If It Hurts, Stop Doing It

Brilliant overall examination and analysis by Gerald Celente and Stefan Molyneux. Wonderful rhetoric. Excellent interviewing and back and forth. And covered the most important bases that people will readily understand and identify with, and which are usually avoided by the perfidious false media. I salute. But when Gerald says around the 32:00 that there is "nothing to pick up the world economy" (viz. "hotspots" from foreign money which will not meaningfully supply any growth), he seems to fall short of his own points which he made so adroitly for 30:00 of symphonic oratory, bordering on the Baroque in its counterpoint. All the stumbling, crawling and seizing up that the world's economies are doing is because they are being HAMSTRUNG intentionally. Later he does emphasize what is won by overcoming such evil hobbling of the world's living communities of people, but I'll spell out what that evil hobbling is and what might be done about it, on the whole.

That evil consists of: 1) Fraudulent banking and finance, involving crimes on an astral scale such as counterfeiting, embezzlement, and black marketeering and many other associated rackets. 2) Suppression of earnings for all but the criminal elite which is impossible to do when people realize that the reason this happens is from collusion of corrupt institutions in commerce and government, all of which should be dealt with by means of proper investigation and arrests, basically criminal legal proceedings 3) Covert criminal activity which is tantamount to class warfare which employs subterfuge, coercion, and racketeering, all involving the use of intelligence assets both human and infrastructural, as well as military- and which involve using the technology suppressed from the public as weaponized forms of covert control AGAINST the public to enslave it (all managed by the 1% and their coterie of house slaves, who seem rather giddy for being fattened for the slaughter as well) 4) Finally, the suppression of technology, period. We know the history of that, why beat around the bush? Suppression of the fullness of Maxwell's research, Tesla's, Rife's, Reich's; Suppression of good medicine which is rooted in herbalist traditions well founded and ancient, as well as common sense as in NOT weaponizing as chemical warfare agents our food, air and water, as well as the "medicine" which is meant to destroy health and suppress symptoms (at best). 5) Weaponized pseudo-culture on all fronts. So what I'm saying is that if these hobbling actions are ceased and prevented from continuing, then naturally economies would grow and thrive, here and all around the world where these right policies took place. So ditto about getting rid of psychotronics control grids and perfidious 5th column police-state secret societies and their minions. Ditto about enforcing any form of artificial scarcity pseudo-economics.

If you want life to thrive, simply stop killing it.

Contra, Adversus Falsus Maximus.

The very nature of an evil force, taken simply, is that it seeks to devour itself blindly.  It is the ontological worst case scenario.  Instead of a substance which by virtue of its nature cannot not exist, we have a pseudo-substance which, by its lack of an essential nature, because of a lacuna in its nature, because of a cosmic lacuna in its vary being, must destroy itself. This in spite of  much evidence indicating that the manifest forms of this evil, as found in the world, are seemingly "too corrupt to fail", to quote Alex Jones' fusion of sarcasm and irony concerning the socio-political deadlock of evil corruption with which we are currently faced.

That is the outcome of evil processes.  When these processes manifested, Good Nature already existed, or else there never would have manifested anything at all, since something like evil (the only alternative, by the metalogic which I use, thoroughly founded on metaphysics and common sense, both), by its very "nature" cannot manifest without having already devoured itself!

It cannot "bootstrap" itself into existence without there already being an existence upon which to parasitically "get a boost".  And that's what it does from then on, from that strange, incredibly tragic moment in cosmic eternity.  From then on begins a duration of time, marked as a cosmic epoch, in which "evil, exists".  In that realm, there is not the beginning of "twoness" or "duality" as such, because as the Greeks wisely knew, there never wasn't a duality and twoness. There is no being in a vacuum, no person in a vacuum, no reality "by itself", because the fecundity of phenomena outright contradict that.  We couldn't get TO metaphysics if we disregarded the fecundity and qualitative irreducibility of plural phenomenality, as that is the ground from which we, in this world, have realized that phenomena have underlying causes, and from that realized so much more which history and our own understanding mutually assure thinking and sane people is a more intelligible world than if we hadn't reached such deep, discerning insights.  And you wouldn't have smart phones or techno-tyrants, either.

But "time" and "duality" take on a qualitative new dimension in this "realm" in which there is this parasitic, yet autocannabilistic force, which as Michael Eigen might have understood in psychological terms as a psychical force that seeks to destroy any positive existence, and then to go on destroying past the mere negation of the positive to zero, seeking to burrow forever into deeper negativities.  I would say it is seeking to destroy itself, but lacks the power to do so. It must be assisted even in that. THAT is of the essential  meaning to what I say when I speak of ontological, and not merely colloquial, evil, and it is that of the former which makes the latter even intelligible and apparent.  Indeed, it is the same exercise of depth perception in the mind of man which identifies the causes of all phenomena which underlies the principles of my ponerology.

The point here being that in that process of assisted suicide, which evil beings are constantly demanding but always avoiding by their cowardly natures, has lead to a point where the Good Reality finally came to grips with just "what" these beings are.  Then the idea of evil was completed, since at first it was regarded as a mystery, then as a deficit in perception, then as a deficit in the refinement of perception into wisdom, then as a deficit in the development of will to Good Action based upon Good Wisdom, then finally it was realized that evil is simply a very unpleasant cosmic fuck up that is no use to anyone, not even itself, secretly hates everything including itself, and yet won't GO AWAY, won't RETURN to that origin which somehow birthed it.

This situation has led to the kind of "duality" to which the New Age apologists constantly whine is only real when people believe that is, which is the one that is real for a time, and hence within that time is believed to be real because it actually is, and this is the antivalent opposition between Good and evil. When the Beneficent, Generous, Eternal Good Minded Reality finally reaches the heart of evil to annihilate it, that will be the end of "time" as we know it here. This realm, a battlefield of Good and (mostly) evil minded entities, has been defined as an epoch of time which results precisely from this conflict, and such that only at the end of that conflict can the duality which caused it end. The end of that conflict is a co-product of the natures of the beings in that conflict and cannot be otherwise.  And it most certainly is NOT a result of a deficient-minded illusion projected by self-victimizing Good People (who simply see evil for what it is). That nonsense is simply the rhetoric of demonic agents of deception who wish to paralyze the remaining Good Judgment and Good Sense of those they exploit, as well as to continue to pretend to be of Good Will by demanding their victims go into a Stockholm Syndrome-type trance and identify with the aggressor. No, it is not a projection, it is a very temporary pseudo-reality which will be ended, not when it is pretended to be unreal, but when it is made to be unreal by being seen for what it is and then dealt with accordingly.

Those who say otherwise are under a spell, whether of their own delusional and spiritual weakness, by various degrees fostered by evil agencies, or else because they simply are those agencies, blathering on with their spell-casting. SEE IT FOR WHAT IT IS.

The Transmutation of Fallacy into Clarity

I said that there is an ontological form of knowledge which best explains the world, even according to all explicitly "flat" or "epiphenomenal" forms of epistemological doctrine. The methods used are the metaphysically superordinate heuristics which, when employed in connection with mundane matters, is manifest as methodologies of examining phenomena and tracing their changes and essences back into an understanding of essence (grammar), the causal processes which underlie them (logic) and this leads to an understanding of what context superficially upholds but in fact covertly subverts a publick discussion of reality (rhetoric).  In other words, it subverts education, philosophy, and virtue itself wherever these come into contact with, in an uncomfortable way, the organized criminal elements which have already subverted society on the whole.

Why episodic periods of perceived authenticity in publick life, in its social roles, its exchanges of value, its cultural discussion?  Because there is something authentic about experience, and everyone, Good and evil, can admit and realize that.  It is just the bare minimum fact that is held in common by every agent which expresses a human body, which is that experiences have a qualitative nature to them which is insisted upon by those who profess to be privy to such experiences as having definitely desired and loathed aspects. All who profess being capable of and sometimes simply subject to these experiences can admit to their existence. This of itself leads to the construction of language in these bodies to take place under an ontologically pre-existing rubric's influence, which has profound implications for both metaphysics and axiology, as well as for aesthetics and politics. But at a minimum, all participants in this massive plurality of unique subjectivities profess, with more or less authenticity, to possess special access to their own psychism and from this profess various sentiments from that authority so as to suggest and justify practical action in the world. 

Publick actors will always at least seek to manifest an authentic intention to meet certain minimal ethical and moral standards as long as there is a chance that they may be publickly sanctioned for failing in that regard.  As does Stefan Molyneux in his examination of those who most virulently opposed the sensibility of Donald Trump's viability as a candidate for the office of President of the United States. Political election processes and media exposure are supposed to help keep such a process more honest in case the wrongs of a candidate can be uncovered in his life and conduct being publickly examined. Supposedly this also helps people see whether or not a candidate has any sense. In most cases such a person does have sense, but not a spiritually real or viable character with any inherent, Divinely invested Conscience, and so in such cases is just some power hungry puppet.

But the world's manifest phenomena lead the honest investigator to ask why and how the norms of expected sensibility in people, and especially in educated people, is literally not belied as the consumer of cultural norms which it would seem that various media and agencies would have us believe in the "mainstream media-culture society".  It would seem that their ethical narrative is an utter self-contradiction, presented and arrayed to people so that they can accept the patronizing of their intelligence and conscience as being something to celebrate, which they subconsciously do when they participate in the enjoyment of such a practical joke with all the optimism of the head sheep following a Judas goat.

But consider whether or not such manipulation is possible with only the classical models of social control which are the literal bridge between oligarchy and outright and open tyranny.  These are the methods which are at minimum covertly operative during the phase which is properly described as "rule by mob". It is often called "democracy", but that is not necessarily a thing to be happy about. And when we consider that the methodologies of a Machiavellian prince are always at play, it helps us to see what organized crime really is in its most complete, and unspecious sense, as a covert from of tyranny by the few sliding down, by a path of subterfuge, racketeering, and coercion, into a full blown tyranny of one.  The implication which we reach as a result is, at some point when Plato's famed character "the perfectly unjust" is ready to come onto the scene, a scenario like this:

The occult tyrannic hegemony feels free to utilize weaponized institutions to conduct covert civil war against those whom they would subjugate, so naturally we expect to find that they have weaponized the media and culture in order to blast the public with fallacious and manipulative narratives whilst attributing all such things to anyone who might dare oppose them in a way that is notable. First they suppress that notice. They attempt to subvert the will (subtle coercion). Then they go full retard with the propaganda (blatant deception). Key to all this is an oligarchic pseudo-middle class of completely corrupted professionals whose profession is to counterfeit and launder social norms (and currency, economic institutions, public discussion, social norms and mores), and who use this system to conduct graft against the genuine publick. The only "real world" mechanism which makes this absurd house of cards manifest at all is the implementation of "psychotronics", which is not merely, nor is it very much at all, to do with the amplification, modulation, and transduction of psychic power. But it is about 90% that if you take into account the notion of "psychic phenomena" to mean in the simple sense of "psychical phenomena" which are the subject of the study of psychology, neuropsychology, cybernetics, and the technological means to put those disciplines to use so as to influence events by means of a technology which can transduce the knowledge of those disciplines into a working method of social control, which seeks as its goal of perfection the attainment of the spiritual enslavement of every single soul in the world. That is known because such technology is empirically known to exist, such motives are known to exist, methods have been fully described and carried out, and the opportunity to do this has been the norm throughout history until today. Honest people who oppose this in any of its forms and manifestations are the only remaining evidence that it has not reached that goal perfectly.

When this happens, we will see the unfolding of a set of absurd conditions of which sense can be made only if a person is willing to develop the amount of ironic sensibility minimal for seeing through aesthetically pleasing deception, an amount of virtue minimal for the appreciation of the value being lost in the process of a fraud being conducted against him, and then finally enough will to take all that good judgment, that good sense, into a way of life that will not be compromised by those sorts of evil forces which are already covertly in place so as to make a covert tyranny possible at the last stages of so-called democracy, a euphemism for mob rule sliding into tyranny.

But in order for this process to move forward, in order for evil to take full control of the world, it must convince whatever remains of a polity's last shreds of conscience to be sacrificed along with a scapegoat that Socrates himself represents, whom Plato called the Perfectly Just.

It was prophesied that when this process of evil corruption, when it has reached its maximum, would invoke, as if by a Divine Law, the arrival of the Judgment of the World. So each person involved, no matter in what way, is wise to ask him/her/it/their self/selves whether or not they are on the right side of Eschatology, because in fact a person's life is nothing more than "their share of the world", and the entire meaning of "The Great Return" is not perceived or experienced by all those involved, in the same "fundamental and qualitatively significant way", and that this will be the critical point where the Wheat are freed from the chaff, where it is seen that almost everything in the world was the opposite of what it seemed, and that this total absurdity should and will be reversed into a complete transparency forcing an authenticity that evil cannot endure, and also cannot falsify.  That is the axiological ontology of "Suum Cuique".  And it cannot fail to be this way, because the reverse is absurd, for then the absurd would not be absurd, which is patently absurd. Therefore, also by metaphysical deduction.

ROBOTS WANT YOUR JOBS (CRIMINALS WANT YOUR WEALTH)

First of all we have an artificially propped up, but also artificially collapsible large scale counterfeiting and embezzlement racket which is supposed to be a "real economy". It is more like a massive hack job built all around an ever more absurd facade that keeps people believing a myth. The real value of work is the final product and all who benefit... There is no SENSIBLE way to go from human action sufficient to give people something rewarding to do with their time, to human action insufficient to give people something rewarding to do with their time, just by making something done more efficient, whether by some machine, some robot, some computer, some method, some process, or some insightful improvement on any of that which is already taking place. There is enough food and shelter to go around, right now WITHOUT robots "taking jobs", that there is no sensible way that just getting rid of some of the work we have right now will cause there to be a shortage of essentials needed for persons to sustain their lives. It is MORE efficient to have a robot do that job? Is it better? Are customers more satisfied? Is there less waste of resources, the elimination of all the danger that would have come with that job for a human being? Then the net result is an improvement for everyone concerned. Now if the human wants to find something else to do in public that seems like a rewarding exchange of his resources of time, energy, ability, talent, passion etc for the sake of some value he seeks, then it can be something else. But there is no reason to go from this to "now this guy has no job"="now he must starve". There is no way to support that scheme of economics as rational or just while at the same time subsidizing massive schemes of counterfeiting, financial, and business fraud which are needed to maintain a false front of a "real media" and a "real economy" when we know, through a massive array of facts, that all the human productivity which has created a massive amount of wealth, and all the more with more efficient roboticized processes of mass production and precision instrumentation and so on, is being basically devoured, enjoyed, and hoarded by a small percentage of completely sheisty, insubstantial, waifish and effete pseudo-intellectuals, pseudo-economists, and other "psuedo"-beings that comprise a massive fraud to which I've already alluded. As an example, take technology suppression and redirection into covert development, the inflated prices and falsified books which enable secret projects to be funded "at taxpayer expense", many of which shouldn't have been done in the first place, and many of which could have been done without being used as an excuse to add yet one more vector of artificially imposed scarcity of resources for people in cities who may, incidentally, be displaced from a job involving the handing of a bag of food to people through a window, or any other such "process of service" which should have been paid better for decades anyway. In fact, there is no reason why, with all the fraud and covert redirection of resources and other schemes taking place, on scales that are plenty massive, that ANYONE should ever be without an abundance of food as a "great equalizer" just to get started in an economy where MERE SERVICE is the commodity, especially if such could be made more efficient just by adding a machine! The same resources that fed and sheltered and clothed people before are still there, so when the "robotic value added" effect is created by the machine, there is a net INCREASE in the efficiency of the economy. The wealth which is already artificially and criminally redirected from "the commoners" who aren't part of those covert and often very illegal activities, including the pseudo-professional regiments of intelligentsia whose job it is to offer arcane justifications in academia and in the media to bully pulpit massively fraudulent schemes down people's throats as a falsified form of what a real economy OUGHT to be like, when instead they are the ones who should lose their jobs and take a pay cut because THEIR "WORK" IS ONLY NEEDED BY ORGANIZED CRIMINALS, THAT wealth should be recollected into a pool and those formerly "useful" paper pushers and lie manufacturers and peddlers ought to be, at best, put on a very subsistence level dole, and people who have been displaced from actual work should be supported comfortably until they can find another part of the economy in which to be helpful. At the very minimum we would then be taking out two problems with one solution, so that Instead of subsidizing pseudo-professional hacks in all sectors of the human potential suppression control grid which passes for a socioeconomic realm of human action, and the political hacks that keep them subsidized at inflated expense to the guy flipping burgers, and instead of throwing him to the winds just because you finally found a way to improve the process of services to such a degree that his position becomes obsolete in the march forward of robotics technology, FIRE THE AFOREMENTIONED HACKS and redistribute THOSE resources into a fund which sustains people who are shifting between economic roles which WEREN'T criminal to begin with!!! I'm leaving out many industries of falsified human action which create massive, fraudulent schemes of malfeasance presented as economic value added, but let me add a short list: Weaponized food, municipal water, and geoengineering projects Weaponized pseudo-medicine Weaponized psychological medicine and pseudoscience Weaponized cultural warfare regimes in collusion with out of control intelligence operations Inflated and predatory military-industrial and technocratic tyrannies which are bloated and damaging to the population Wars that shouldn't have been conducted Money in the Pentagram and other institutions that "went missing" Counterfeit fiat money scams coming out of central banks to add an amazingly thin veneer of economic propriety to these other massive frauds all of which are not feasible except as criminal activities which are used to suppress human liberties and freedoms while feeding it to the populace that his is some sort of necessary evil inherent to the way economics works, or as though this were the proper response to conditions of danger artificially created or exaggerated by these same hacks and criminals in all those areas just mentioned. MANY MORE...

Raspberry Blues Sung in the Ink Black of Human Defilement Sound Kinda Pretty

When I speak of deduction from absurdity I should clarify what that entails. I envision the "status quo", the version of reality in the heads of the majority of people.  These are people who seem to take the facades of their world and its events as being far more authentic than they really are.  These events and their backdrops of supposed authority are mainly "fronts" for far more significant events. And then I look under the facades and examine the events that are "passed" across the consciousness of people as if either they never happened or else that it was excused by these other events which are also narrated by parts of the facade.  Not only do I find out that these facades and staged (or grandstanded) events are in the service of blatant and sheer wrongdoing in fact, but also that the facades which bless these events (and what goes on beneath them) only pretends to dislike such horrors.  They only dislike anyone coming to realize their degree of collusion with one another and with the "stage managers and producers" so as to realize into our world the horrors of utter, complete and colossal corruption into a way of life.

The complete realization of complete slavery.

At first it had to be set up covertly, because you don't go for the frontal assault on something like that in this day and age.  First, instead, they prepare their victims, on whatever scale and in whatever mode, suits the occasion, the need for control being the primary theme in any of the plots which then arise.

Take for example, the issue of conflict with Iran. While Iran is definitely no saint on the earth, neither is any other nation as far as I can see. But let's look at the issue of who deserves negative attention in light of terrorism as a method asymmetrical warfare. If Iran were involved in 9-11, that would be very bad for them, wouldn't it?  And if Saudi Arabia were involved, that would be very bad for them. What if some elements of our own national infrastructure were involved? Bad, very bad for them. And anyone who genuinely wants those guilty of such acts would want all pertinent evidence fully examined. No, I'm not going to go into the steel wreckage, or what was left of it.

Basically, do we live in a world where Justice is truly being pursued by any of the persons acting in the world, whether or not as representatives of corporations, governmental or otherwise? If so, what would that world look like in terms of our relationship to Iran, if it were more in line with actual harms done to one another?

Instead of what some have been up to, imagine a world where they'd do the opposite.
Imagine a world where they balk at the Saudi's threats to penalize the U.S. with an economic warfare action if certain documents were fully exposed to the public's examination? Imagine a world where they negotiated with the Iranians where possible, who would also no doubt like to see any documents which are pertinent to the background of the 9-11 attacks exposed. After all, those are attacks which have since been used as a a pretext for hitting people and nations with the "terrorist" label seemingly willy nilly, while being exempt from such accusations even while being caught funding them and supplying them. I doubt Iran wants to be blamed for acts they had no part of doing. I'm sure if they were the truly guilty party, or in any way guilty, it would show from all the available evidence in some very detectable forms.

Let's say something was worked out so that they'd keep the 2.2B of Iran's assets in good faith until we see who's really at the bottom of 9-11, then settle it once and for all time. If the Truth comes out that Iran had nothing to do with such terrorism, then they could have their money back, and we'd take .75B as a loan to offset the cost of releasing the document, paid at interest of 5% due to all the strife caused by interfering with the government and nation, fomenting Iraq to go to war with them, etc.
Doing justice to only the tip of the iceberg of things that would be different in a sane and just world, I have taken as an example this ONE event and looking into its causes reveals a growing webwork of events and agents engaged in them which dictate a rethinking of the world's supposed hegemony, and to come to understand one which is much more like some science fiction novel about alien lifeforms from another dimension.
So what could underpin such insanity, such structural injustice, such pervasive corruption, yet yield to it such stability through people's seeming inability to connect dots right in front of their faces?

Aside from chemical warfare assaults, energy weapons assaults, and all other means of covert warfare, there is propaganda, and there is PSYCHOTRONICS. Every element of their systems of control catalyze all the others. Any breach of any of these elements weakens them all. But if any given one of these elements is allowed to be exempt from proper scrutiny, then the INFOWAR is one of attrition.

Well, that comment was whitelisted from my own view, at least.  Possibly from everyone's view.  It is when my words are whitelisted from anyone else's view, without their direct permission and knowledge, that there is a deep level of corruption. For example, concerning the state of China reaching scientific par with the west I wrote a comment as shown below, and it seems sputnik allowed it, or at least allowed me to see it.

I tried to tell people this and they said I was crazy or weird. That is a non-sequitur, because even if I were crazy and weird, this situation where Chinese have, by sheer force of numbers, MORE geniuses overall than any country in the world, and they have reached some critical mass in their work somewhere in the secret bowls of their "undersociety" (the one that does the magic that makes the "ubersociety" hold its position in the hierarchy of the "visible" world). They of course would inevitably do that since all attempts to control them with technology backfired by simply giving them the advantage of having science to study and inventions to reverse engineer, if they weren't just outright given the patents. Since the main domain of power of applications of covert technology IS ITSELF covert, and the applications are meant to have a very LOW visibility to deniability ratio, and since they've gotten the system to be so damned inverted and invasive that people can't even see what's right in front of them and lying makes Pinocchio giddy as his nose shrinks to a perfect shape and size to suit his whim at any moment, then we have a WCS. A worst case scenario.

Perhaps that comment will remain forever on their servers, and perhaps all the world can see it that whole time.  Perhaps it is NOT whitelisted, at least it isn't from me. But who knows? Maybe they have tricky ways of manipulating internet topologies so as to maximize their control of the flow of information so that it maintains also a degree of transparency.  Perhaps they calculate they can use their surveillance of the internet in "search of bad guys" be the perfect cover for preventing society from realizing that what it is doing to itself on the surface is almost just as absurd and evil as what it is actually doing underneath. 

Perhaps that is what Prince couldn't live with any longer.  I'm not even going to attempt to comment in that page's comment section. Why bother any more?  But let's just say that one must make a point as long as there is a glimmer of a chance that people who are rational and of Good Conscience can make some better sense of their strange world because of it.  Who knows, maybe the flapping of butterflies' wings aggregates into some sort of Peng Bird arising from Hyperborea. Perhaps to an audience of NONE.  Guess we'll see "at the End", won't we?

My vision of him is that he wanted to live life to the fullest, yet wanted to do the least harm to others that he could in that process.  Yet, he had to be "roommates" to fame and glory with a lot of very evil beings.  That means he got to prance around like a unicorn of talent, but he'd better not forget that the crown around his neck has a chain connected to it.  Looks like he got tired of the sublime slavery.  Must be that the rewards are not as sweet as they are made to seem, even if it comes in the form of "exploring one's creative potential and enriching the culture with artistic beauty", even if it means "living life to the fullest", even if it means "expressing great talent", because it must also mean "never telling the Truth unless told, and only in the way told, and only when told" etc.

Just remember, if you are involved in any such perfidies, it will not favor you, no matter how high you climb in any hierarchy. This whole world is subject to Divine Law, like it or not. And that Law is stronger than any FAKE SPIRITUAL LAWS which are CONCOCTED BY PHONY HIEROPHANTS, no matter in what form, no matter at what angle or from what tier they propound their self-serving evil filth.

Right and Wrong Ways and Reasons to Arm a Polity

There are two ways or reasons to disarm someone, just as there are two ways and reasons to arm someone. Both have a rationale, but one always frustrates tyrants more, especially evil and weak tyrants. One is the favorite of Good men (self defense and of one another against any crime against their life and property or other rights), and the other is the favorite of evil men (to get the upper hand against their victims, whom they prefer to be unarmed and weak-minded, and feeble of body also).

Look at what sort of society your culture and government and financial system, by their policies, would prefer. You will know them by what sort of society they prefer to arm. Either a caste society of the armed and the disarmed, or a legal system where only convicted felons are disarmed, or those who suffer severe mental debility which prevents them exercising their own rights to the point that they cannot be relied upon to defend themselves or others from a violent attack because they might not be able to tell the difference between a violent attack and a family hugging one another (it has to be that bad... sorry, be polite to offset the risks). But that would be a generous limit, and would well-define the matter as to rights and risks of those who would infringe them. Know well your limits and do not aggress or threaten another (including with any threats of calling the police and lying hysterically). If someone "gets crazy" enough to go across that line, it is as likely to be an intelligent, cunning, and ambitious person as it is to be someone just trying to control the room where they like to hang out frequently and has no other ambition in life as far as can be discerned. If they do that, and they get violent, in both cases "the room" will vote, on the spot, to defend themselves if he draws arms against them. Bullying will go on in subtle ways, as groups will still be groups with their regular (perhaps psychotronically reinforced) sociodynamics. But basically, the odds are much more evened out across society, and everyone is, overall, much safer from crime.


That is exactly why we have to clearly distinguish between a society of unarmed serfs and a society of armed citizens. And we also need to distinguish between two types of armed citizens: those who wish to disarm only convicted felons (and retards, and incoherent idiots, to use the classical senses of those terms), and those who wish to disarm anyone but themselves, who are defined as the only who are worthy of the right to bear arms... and they claim to be, by some degree, more worthy than the average citizen, to a degree that is either to imply a greater degree for them, a lesser one for the rest of society, or both. This leads to a range of polities, distinguished in their outer form on a continuum which could be represented as being between China and Switzerland on the extremes. Those are consistent extremes which bear out extremes of dealing with the issue of a citizen's rights and liberties on other continua, all of which have something in common: their privation upon the citizen increases in direct proportion to the disarming of the citizen relative to the arming of the police. If the military is used AS police, then that is a case on the extreme end. It's like the renaissance cannot be extended as a benefit to anyone unless they are well-armed....

Living in a world of grown up, rational men armed with guns is not bad, because you will one way or another. Either you can be among them, or you can be disarmed and be among them. The issue is that there are two kinds of grown up rational men: mature, moral, and decent men or infantile (even bestial), immoral, and unscrupulous evil greedy men. They will always gladly be armed or protected by armed guards, you'll note. But if you live among the rational armed men who are good, then you may disarm yourself if you want, though in a safe society you are now among the weakest links in the chain of good and decent people who want to exercise their rights while respecting your right to do the same, so long as you respect theirs, then why shouldn't you be armed also, to help defend that? And why would they dare think to disarm you? Then an armed police force would be a service, selected from among those already honorably protecting the peace! Therefore, the only other world, where power derives from the barrel of a gun ONLY, then you will have a group without all that goodness and decency, but a lot of evil lust and the rationality to plan accordingly when taking office and gaining resources. Organized crime is their means, ill-gotten gain of power and wealth is their objective, but their primary objective is control of others to make them submit to what is tantamount to slavery pure and simple. Naturally, they would want exclusive rights to arms, and would like exclusive rights to legitimacy in bearing them in any case. That is their means of culturally coercing people to accept such a thing, by means of false flag attacks and media and cinema and other arts. But if organized criminals ever got behind the facades of authority, they would use it as a mask to manipulate people into seeing all legitimate force being exercised by them, THROUGH the government. They would argue that it is for the government "per se", but of course they are wearing government effectively as a mask, and mean "themselves, the beneficiaries of power". THEY will want to erode the legitimacy of non-government actors being free to defend themselves and forge their own fates. They would do that by creating false alternatives and fallacious arguments of all kinds pumping them through their propaganda machine as augmented by a toxiceutical assault, psychotronically reinforced human slave grid, the "digital ghetto", the "hologram of human action". When you are disarmed, then those criminals who happen to occupy government offices will be able to steer events toward their further control with less risk to their own personal lives, and also with more efficient use of criminal "operatives" in the streets... Do you see how a police state has formed, how secret police run everything, and how that is so much smoother if the citizenry are disarmed? Then of course they would implement any strategy which leads to this result. Only a fool doesn't see this. Here you are being disarmed as a de facto criminal, just meekly and defenselessly awaiting the day it will be declared de jure (upon sufficient contrived evidence.. you've seen the movie). I prefer the world of rational men who, if decent, can also defend themselves, and who would prefer, even if being the vast majority of people, that we disarm only citizens who are convicted of a felony offense of any kind. No other prohibition will be considered, except gross mental debility. In other words, we're not so much talking any of the symptoms seen in a DSM and more the sort of side effects of taking any drugs or eating any poisons which have been excused as "safe" for consumption or as medicine. But that's commonplace now, along with corruption, as so many sectors of the economy are now a part of DE FACTO EMBEZZLEMENT RACKETS.

For example, and in the same vein as being disarmed, people are now under risk of being dis disimbursed of their property known as "cash", which are actually just promissory notes and not money per se, but at least has a physical form you can "keep to yourself". If they are allowed to take cash out of your pocket, that's legalized crime. When they are allowed to take ALL cash out of ALL pockets and give them a merely digital representation in a computing system used to swindle you more securely and covertly than ever before possible, then that's also legalized crime. Motive, method, opportunity, then you find the agent. Que bono? Controlling, organized criminal actors. By what means? Using facades of authority, along with psychological, toxiceutical, toxological, cultural and other means of covert civil warfare, the methods of such psychopathic narcissists is more easily understood. Opportunity was had throughout the formation of the country, in its wars, political developments, in all the "normal" vicissitudes of the nation state organized around some legal principles in spirit or letter. So we would expect such a move toward enhanced control and security over "the cash that WAS in your pocket" and now isn't... It's like taking your wallet out of your pocket and then requiring you to use them as a middle man, by sending some goon or footservant to follow you around holding your wallet for you. Someone you don't even know or trust, but has a name tag and a government number. Anyway, instead of having it that "good", all the footservants are digital, inside a computing system, and all of this is far from your direct access, and surrounded by fortresses bristling with modern weapons surrounded by an "outer court" of well-managed foolish slaves...inside a psychotronically reinforced political gulag that some dare call "cities of free people". Pretty sad state of affairs if psychotronics is also implemented, and you are DISENFRANCHISED OF ALL PROPERTY ALSO DISARMED on top of all that corruption. It would be a clear symptom that you had passed over into the realm usually reserved for the Dark Ages. It is much easier to impoverish a disarmed citizenry by means of increasing the pressure by what are by definition criminal means. But doing it more systematically and through institutions which should prevent what they are doing magically makes it seem okay to most sheep, because they are embedded in a control grid as I've outlined many times. The effect has a cause which is proportionately absurd to disbelieve (given the effects it explains) just as it is absurdly difficult for people to face as the actual state of affairs. Of course it would be... But leaving the absurd behavior unexplained is not bad, and finding flaws in the proposed explanation is always appropriate, but if in failing to do that one has no better explanation, then the resistance is due to some well-motivated resistance to accepting the basic realities of right and wrong which properly stand in judgement over human action. That's the mind of a criminally insane victim, a robbed, disarmed criminal who refuses fulfill his duties as a citizen, and de facto has come to deserve his fate, and has dared to lurk on the battlefield hoping to avoid doing what is right OR what is wrong, eventually being devoured by the sea of events around him as a mere ignavus (meaning "coward").

That's a sea of self-destruction which will devour any society which indulges in covert civil warfare with the help of technology and covert actions, integrated by networks of instant communication and funded by counterfeit fiat money. That has to be stopped, either by proper police work or by some force greater with the proper Authority to redress this sort of collective and pervasive corruption. That will be the inevitable result, coming sooner or later merely as people are more or less resistant to corruption. But in the end, each will be found manifesting a final moment of their truth nature. The vision of that being complete for either an Ultimate Good or an ultimate evil is what is encapsulated in the visions of eschatology. But the logic of eschatology is what you ought to be concerned with here. Certain results cannot obtain without the requisite causal precursors being qualified in terms of moral decision making, and then the ontology of those processes can be completed. Matter is supervenient upon this sort of mind, not the reverse. Therefore, all minds and mentalities will be polarized for or against certain principles which cannot share the same polity except by means of a compromise between Good and Legitimate Society and foul, petty, and degraded pseudo-society at the other extreme. All societies will oscillate between these extremes, but eventually there must be a decision on that entire bunch, as the compromises between Good and evil can only disfavor evil in the long run while benefiting it in the short run. The only question is what will Good Men do in the short run, which may or may not add up, as it runs on and on, to a "very long run, indeed" Those who would sacrifice that of Eternal Value for what is evil and temporal will lose both just as they deserve neither. Only those who properly steward what is of temporal value have even a snowball's chance in hell of being worthy of Eternal Existence. The rest have at best an eternal oblivion. But there is Justice in the Cosmos, and so they will have worse, just as the Just will have better.