By Way of Absurdity, A Deduction

I have been paying only cursory attention to politics until Ron Paul, and then I have noticed nothing good in it until now Donald Trump. But even with that much distraction, I would think Paul Ryan would have had a more significant political background and history in order to become the deciderer of the presidency. Even leaving aside psychotronics control grids, it seems inane for him to believe that people will magically forget that their vote was SUPPOSED to matter. People are far gone, but not far gone enough for that pure and undiluted horse shit. 

And counterfeit fiat money embezzled through criminal clearing houses called banking institutions do not constitute proper and orderly financial activity in a civilized society, but are simply counterfeiting, embezzling, and later, after being used for many nefarious purposes, it is laundered, or jettisoned since they can just counterfeit more anyway. This goes on "smoothly" partly because of psychotronics control grids, but also because they use massive debt as an excuse to presume the value of money at a rate that does not keep up with for some, but exceeds greatly for others, the rate of economic growth.  

That system allows social engineering within, by, and in connection with governmental organizations, all under cover of authority and propriety. The fact that I can spell this out plainly is nothing but a sign that I can see what is going on right in front of me in the world. I'm sane. Big deal. The problem is that people don't see that the key to subverting such a control grid is the proper exercise of their Divine Right to use their best judgement and act in their best conscience, and never to that Right subverted, especially not by criminal means, and especially not by covert criminal means.  

But this they do, and they also carry the emblems of authority which is presumed vested in Honor, but they subvert the very notion of Honor in their conduct. And this goes on so systematically that I would have to call Trump a cartoon version of what a well-motivated political good guy does. Best actor on stage. Best candidate for President and CEO of the United States Corporation, but as long as covert civil warfare is taking place, he is president of pirate ship whose crew is at war with a class of galley slaves.  

And who can sensibly deny that those in the crew are warring with one another as well, in fear of something they don't understand which has no forgiveness for sins (though they kid themselves it is up to them, and they say that it does), and soon this "world" which is by these lights a pirate ship of fools, will destroy one another or commit self-destruction, perhaps even before larger, higher-dimensional forces can execute Final Judgement.

And because all this really is the way power circulates through the world as it is, and these are the stakes as it is, why would you want to throw psychotronic control grids into it? That'd just skew and fuck up the whole karma is the excuse for corruption going on pseudo-religious victim-get-used-to it trauma death cults that pass for societies of individuals. But then again, if you tweak it just right, people won't notice that contradiction being yet consistent with overly made up appearances, dressed up to disguise the workings of a control grid of deep complexity and multilayered "cultures" within its labyrinthine and recondite bowels. In those depths lie techniques and methodologies which defy conscience entirely. And embarrassment of evil.

That Finality is the sum essential result of the moral significance of people's moral decision making summed up into whole which, if going beyond a certain threshold, will certain require that the "world" is the problem, in a systematic way indicative of being invaded by a parasitic entity, perhaps in the form of a strata of constituency within society's customary and normalized parameters of civilian exchange. This entity cannot comprehend an existence where its privileged corruption is not subsidized by an army of willing victims and useful idiots. It would do all it could to prevent such by praying to its own delusions. Its delusion of choice is that these people who rise up and tell the truth about corruption and its most worrisome aspects of entrenched power, they are the ones treated as "the bad people", while the captains of organized crimes get to do their evil under the banner of celebrity and heroism...  

They would hope that their underlying thesis, that of Thrasymachus, is true which states that justice is in the interest of the stronger. They would hope that Justice cannot come in a form which would reprimand them for that working definition of "justice" and then acting accordingly.  Of course, sometimes the stronger happen to be Just, and so in that case justice happens to be in the interest of the stronger. But that does not mean that there won't be those still stronger who demand IN-justice to them whom they've made weaker? A relative system of "justice" is invented among a pack of criminals. It doesn't matter how hoity toity, fancy pantsy, or well-rewarded an evil punk is, that's all he will ever be, a well-financed evil punk. 

And if men whose duty it is supposed to be to apprehend criminals don't apprehend THAT bunch, then surely they have sealed their visions of utopia and their cherished values (in some cases IF ANY), and they have cast them on the wrong side of a losing battle. That is because actually in the end, Justice arrives in a form which will harshly correct relativist delusions that might makes right, and reveal that, despite appearances, Right will make Might. That will be seen when their vision of the role in their movie-life reaches the "Grand Finale", or as I like to call it, the final grandiosity.  

But it won't be like stepping out of the spa, all refreshed. Instead, when Justice arrives, it will feel like being caught trying to kidnap someone's baby while running for president. But since they actually do get involved in human trafficking on both personal and mass scales, I suppose they'll just be reminded what reprisal feels like for doing all that on the expectation that they'd never be CAUGHT. On the assumption that on a cosmic level Right does not make Might, but only the reverse.

That finality, in which all Good Men believe and seek to see made real in a True Eutopia, that finality which cannot be prevented or slowed by evil men no matter how well organized, but only changed in its overall shape, so that the mystery of the quotient is resolved into revelation of Justice, that is the Finality of the epoch of evil for Eternity. Reality will be divided once and for all time, with a border keeping evil out of it. For one the reward is existence, for the other non-existence. Suum Cuique, to each his own.

Hypothesis Confirmed in all Non-Absurd Possible Worlds : So either Pray for an Absurdity of Cosmic Proportions Or Face Reality

In any event, facing reality requires that we observe ironies, especially when they abound in the publick, which mockin' melodies, sleepin' all night with open eyes, and performs all day with closed-eyed obedience, to liars and thieves, hypocrites, organized criminals, petty criminals, faux celebrity and demonic covert civil warfare. But let's start with the mundane and then proceed to the profane occult of the matter.

Just start with the obvious, using our current political drama, the search for a worthy president for the office of.. well we'll get to that. Let's start with some preliminary observations about some of the contenders. Starting and focusing on Cruz and Trump, leaving Kasich to the side like a creepy looking potato salad. The real irony about Ted Cruz is that, if you take everything he says that is bad about Trump to be about him, and every thing good about himself to be about Trump, he is telling what sounds like a description of the facts. And that's true no matter WHAT you think of Ted Cruz OR Donald Trump. The facts of their campaigns, their rhetoric, their conduct, their demeanor, their associations with the establishment and the nature of those, indicates that Ted Cruz is the villain in all his own criticisms of Trump, and he says the exact reverse of what seems more true. 

Ted Cruz for sanctimonious hypocrite Bob Kasich for foodie general (or gluttinous maximus) Not serious contenders for the Office of the President. Hillary is out of the question. Hence, it's Donald Trump. Donald Trump, world renowned boss for President and CEO of the United States corporation, armed with psychotronics, psywar infrastructure and a demonic infrastructure of secret society operating in networks of corruption, with their own rules and hierarchies parallel two, and with the pretense of being above and superior two, the one that everyone seems to take for granted as "the way things are". I don't really feel I want any of those men to presume to represent the interest or protection of MY RIGHTS. I'd rather just have my own island at this point. Contact me for the movie rights, or just learn to think for yourselves, see through the lies, and watch it all around you for free. Then you'll see why you are the causes leading to your effects. But what might be interesting to investigate, well let's just say "entertain they hypothesis" that Donald J. Trump is the "Chief Archon of them all", and a super pet project of the establishment to get their own boss into the spotlight, with just enough "benign strongman with character" image to project people back into a subtle trance as the final stages of Projekt Bluebeam kick off. He's going to do most of what he says, or try to, but all this will simply reinforce the psychotronics control grid, in tandem with the secret Stasi police state. It's all melodrama, therefore, when compared with what he will not change, and with what he is always a secret part of: The Granfalloonery on its way to hell. It is an interesting hypothesis, since those issues are ne'er spoken aloud, but those "in the know" know damned well that there are none truer spoken than what I say about them. If it WERE true, it would be perfectly consistent with the worst case scenario, and therefore harbinges the visit of a Celestial Visitation that will not be friendly to this domain. At the very least, the emblems and symbols and offices of authority will be stripped of those unworthy of them. Either way... Because if Donald J. Trump IS NOT anything like a psychotronic sock puppet, but instead really is his own man (as I believe sometimes Good Men slip past the traps and smash their way through), then I predict there will either be nothing said or done about covert class warfare by the mechanism I describe, or else he will try to do something about it and get wacked (which means I don't subscribe to the "There has already been a military coup of the government, we're under double secret martial law stuff), or he will not try to do anything about it. Either way, the outcome is not adequate to ensure the worthiness of the survival of this world and all that is within it. But if by some major miracle he were actually opposed to such crypto-tyrannic technocracy, and if he actually dismantled such a system (including the counter-fiat money controlled pseudo-economic, technologically retarded human zoo that constitutes the world's nations, including America's, but perhaps more brutally primitive and "modern classical" forms of organized crime in most of the other countries of the world. This country had (and still has) the benefit of one of the most sensible social contracts, on paper and in its "know how" that there is in the world. But the god damned covert statism bullshit has got to get the fuck off the stage or this scene is going to face a crash course with an unholy destiny. All evidence is that it already has, and without hope of retrieval, but when the Celestial Judge arrives, at least put your fucking stupidity away for that big event. Stop being a big fake sorority is sissy-assed trolls and creeps and ghosts and stalking criminals and look upward to the heavens, and face yourselves, face your destiny. Causes must lead to their effects, the results will resemble the process which led to it, and what you've meted out you have to receive in kind. One man cannot just waltz in and reverse the crimes of the level and scope I have been talking about, but which go ignored, and hence unaddressed by those who think D.J. Trump is the answer, the solution, practically the messiah. He's the preferred candidate, but when I look at him as an individual in his own right, he does not do more than reach par for the course. He's just saying and doing what reasonably ought to be expected of someone who has common sense, a lot of money, great body guards, and an extroverted personality OUGHT to do if they are also decent and honest. But these control grids I talk about have made a mockery of the institutions of the utmost honor. And as far as I can see, those institutions have not meaningfully resisted ANY of these covert civil warfare protocols. Planet X for World Judge. Donald Trump for President. People involved in covert civil warfare and organized crime, to hell with you.

Society Should Experiment with Non-Subterfuge, Non-Racketeering, and Non-Coercion. Yeah, That'd Be Great.

These "social experiments" are most often a cover for people who are part of organized street theater used to target anyone upon command of handlers. It's an entire line of work called human intelligence, perhaps a bit oxymoronically. It does require a certain type of intelligence to notice such things occurring, and it requires a certain amount of that same intelligence plus talent at acting and training, and motivation, to be engaged in them (and many there art). But really there is a severe deficit in "moral intelligence", which means to say in having a Good Conscience. We're talking about a fundamental looking the other way on a massive level in some cases, bordering on a sort of deformation of the personality analogous to schizophrenia, hysteria, or perhaps multiple personality disorder to name a few, and judging by the types of minds that must exist in those persons who conduct criminal activity as if it were a decent, even honorable thing to do.

Of course it is sold as some noble endeavor or another, regardless of what the facts bear out compared to how such things could be much better accomplished, or at all accomplished (such as peace and safety). These corrupt institutions will often be central to the criminal and wicked acts they are supposed to be deterring, defusing, or reducing in some way. They've become the most organized criminal mafia imaginable, with tech that blows away what is known to exist on the market for at least 15 years to come.

In some tech they are as far beyond the public as we are above islanders who never got past grass huts. So yes, along with counter-fiat money ready to hand and a seemingly ever-complicit and buffoonish public, sure I can see that would be a true thing to say, that such subterfuge would be employed on many scales as the equivalent of an entire industry (intelligence industry, subterfuge department, clandestine operations). Welcome to one step beyond the programming. I just used the same phenomenon used to "study" or "demonstrate" the programming, and shifted your attention to the programmers themselves. Soon they'll put chips in you and shock collars on you.

It'll be as common as tattoos, which will be mandatory as well.  Then, you'll be a high-tech slave in addition to being a slave to high-tech.  That will then be the first direct link of the visible world you think you know, and the invisible one which seeks to lay claim to your soul, or what's left of it, before world's end.  Most people just want to live in their fantasy bubbles until the system decides to pop it when it ripens for their purposes, which will mean the most cowardly form of life apart from becoming such villainous control freaks or compromising to them wittingly and willingly.

We haven't even yet contemplated the huge mechanism and network which lie aback the 4th wall of these social control grids, which includes some really advanced technological equipment, process methodologies, and culture of psychopathology as their evil norm.  Hypocrisy constitutes the entire operation from their end, whilst self-delusion and submission to evil constitute everyone else's role.  Where to be in scene, what sort of prop, what role of the moment, with how much risk,  how much reward.. that all decided by the covert equivalent of social worker bureaucracy.  An "archon's playground", but for those who are commodified it is a spiritual prison in a war of Good against evil.  This doesn't change if you fool yourself about it and go along, but it does perhaps become worse in that case.  But if it gets worse as you awaken to Reality, then it does nothing different, and eventually must capitulate to Spiritual Power from the Source of Right, which is far greater than the most coercive entity of an evil nature.

Those evil being involved in control grids and their manipulation or service, they must eventually answer for their crimes, just as everyone who would not stand for their wickedness will be restored and rewarded.  But this they do not believe, or they prefer to avoid contemplating.  They would like it that their victims would imitate them in this regard.  Makes them better slaves.

Some Facts Relevant to Any Discussion of Good and evil

Covert internet digital gulag topologies are real. 3rd man infiltration social media filters are real. 5th column covert social networks in all strata of society, operating in parallel as a Stasi infrastructure, are real. Cooption of any private endeavor by local "Stasi barons" through intermediaries of counter-fiat money-paid goons and buffoons conducting campaigns of interference and street theater, are real. Psychotronics control grids which regulate the private aspects of your consciousness (where possible), all integrated with necessary adjuvants in the toxiceutical and acoustic/energy weapons warfare of a covert civil war utilizing dual-purposed civil institutional infrastructure (for example, MEDICAL TYRANNY, and many other systems), all with the support of confiscated improvements in technology used to serve the "elite" few, weaponized against all subordinates and enemies (insubordinates), are real.

I am Real. The Truth is Real. The Consequences which accrue to each person, Good or evil, are Eternally Real.
And Alex's interpretation of "Knowledge of Good and evil" is accurate, and not the standard interpretation, which says that evil is disobedience to an arbitrary "god" figure. It is disobedience to conscience. And those who would disobey, "fell". Those who in a given human life HAVE Spiritual Dignity, have a Conscience. Otherwise, they are devils or clay men. Those who "fall" don't simply have access to evil given or offered them by evil beings, but they are taught not to distinguish Good and evil, and taught that this is "special knowledge privileged for God", while saying that no one except so-and-such has that Divine Heritage.

I See all they do, and I Know all they do, who are evil, by means of all faculties which a mind has to Know what is True, what is Right, and what is Real, by means of LOGIC, CONSCIENCE, and SENSE. Those who are nasty in their evil nature have no such faculty, but only see that those who have this "ineffable quality" will not cooperate with their evil needs, and so they have tried direct coercion, and whenever that is strategically defeated, then they decide to pretend to be benefactors with authority over their flock of sheep, and this works for a while because some virtue did accrue to a "middle class". But finally, the psychotronically augmented "slave recapture grid" has been put into place, and "the middle class" let it happen. That's the sad Truth. The happy Truth is that those who Know this and act accordingly are the only Ones who will survive its completion.

It Is or It Ain't : Waffling on Matters of Antivalence Leads to Severe Inconsistencies

I try to listen to David Icke with an open mind, I really do. But I find that his spiritual advice runs against the grain of the facts and truths concerning the world's evil structure and conduct, facts about the world which require an absolutist approach, and one which is proportionate to the variations and subtleties of the ways these two primary categories of Reality manifest themselves. He claims it is false dichotomy. He does it even to this day, which amazes me. Alex suffers not to make this mistake. Alex Jones of course. But his love of an idyllic vision of the world which is not in itself wrong, is still something which in weaker minds leads to compromises so as to attain proximate illusions. But he doesn't make that mistake. On an emotional and spiritual level, it seems that what David Icke says about matters of people's judgement claims that their inability to properly distinguish Good and evil is taken advantage of by false alternatives being thrown at them (true). These false alternatives are not things which both I and Alex Jones would both say are either Good or evil without an overlap (as would many people.. as might David Icke himself if he were confronted with it more directly. Like child rape. Okay?). But then he goes on to imply that the problems which arise in the world concerning what we dislike "in our movies/movie" is merely each one's own delusion. Well, I hope the hell not, because Jimmy fucking Seville is no part of my movie, so fuck you if you say all that is a projection of me. That's what Jimmy wants to project into the world as acceptable and "noble" to do, and this is his projection. My projection of what is right is imitated by the outward presentations of these perverts, who pretend to be talented nobility, but in fact they are protected criminals who are lower than animals! That is NOT my projection, that is a God damned FACT.

I ask everyone, as I asked David Icke: 

In response to this video.

"Would you agree that counterfeit money, covert 5th columns given a promise of exception from engineered economic suffering (and mostly kept ignorant of the "economic collapse" clause, which excludes their interests entirely), and would you also agree that psychotronics, combined with these prior two forces which are relatively ancient, is the critical "catalyst" that explains the modern contradiction of harsh realities and people's seeming obliviousness toward them? Otherwise you have to say they are rather hopeless clay pots, judging by their passivity, all the more by the "lower denizens" of the evil control grids. At least that these are structural realities of its methodology. [These are things that every investigator of the matter of the world's ways of corruption and suffering have discovered by one means or another, under one rubric or another. David's answer would be "yes", those are not dismissed as merely the side effects of an unloving populace. I've fairly proven that the unloving populace is a manifestation, partly a side effect, but rather the co-cause... in a vicious feedback loop, and I've proven that it is in most cases]

But as to religion hi-jacking the civilization with false alternatives called Good and evil, rather it is the race of clay men seemingly born to act as ignorant beasts which have the proclivity of hijacking religion with their passive-aggressive ways of interpreting Good and evil as being false alternatives, such as "love and hate". It seems to me you have the principle of the matter stated backward. Nothing wrong with excellent categories describing the only fundamental binary choice in existence. It is just that some people offer fallacious interpretations of what those categories are, contain, and imply. You seem also to run the danger of doing the same. Failing to draw a distinction that is so fundamentally unique in its only instance of significance would miss the point. Like it or not, everything in the world is some percentage of Good and evil aspects, and by varying degrees and proportions. And people ought to make their own honest assessment of those facts and make responsible evaluations which protect what is Right against what is wrong. This distinction is not the problem. The problem is with those who manipulate people by means of cowardly and evil acts of coercion and deception to make them too intimidated to attempt to exercise conscientious judgment about matter that EXACTLY ARE BLACK AND WHITE. The manipulators will of course degrade this binary operation of choice (the only if its kind in Reality), and not want people to see it clearly, so as not to make the right choice (don't go to hell by aiding and abetting those who rape children's innocence). But you take it one worse by claiming the problem are these categories. That's not it."

I try to make small comments, I really do, but then things get tricky.

Long comments in this video are here recapitulated.

"Very good psychology lesson. But not only that; several profound gems. The uselessness of the "fear state" as a state of compromise, when telling the Truth is what only cowards fear. They fear being exposed for some crime they are in on. They have bad faith, bad conscience (if any conscience). If anyone "should" be afraid, it is them, for being guilty, for acting "in secret" all while being perfectly transparent to the Greater Cosmos of the complete and ever-perfecting Reality, of which those who would control others through fear will not be allowed to exist within as living conscious beings, but will be transformed into non-agental corpuscles of energy, utterly passive and permanently neutral until required for the engendering of New Beings, who will not be THEM (nor their evil memories or actions or characteristics), but will be THOSE WHO WERE SUPPRESSED, BY THAT DEGREE RESTORED TO THEIR FORMER GLORY AND BEYOND.

Also, while on the one hand you are saying really good things concerning self-development of being Right in the head and heart, they are often handy as rhetoric to beat people over the head who have zero inclination to love rapist, head-chopping, pedophile augmenting bureaucrats of corruption and destruction which you at times seem to suggest are merely projections of those who bemoan such things. Rest assuredly that they are not merely projections of the minds which detest them and want them changed, but of those who adore such evil and like things as they are, or perhaps a bit better if you please (though perhaps many times worse for you). They have their own agency, and it is an evil one. One doesn't sit down and have reasonable discussions with flowers in our hair with such evil. It doesn't happen that way. The current archon's paradise is a result of that sort of fallacy. If you mean to say that this "movie" costars some evil beings who feed on being submitted to by means of accepting their confidence trick version of love and friendship, then you must sensibly allow for vitriol in the right direction. Otherwise, you're just saying "what's all the fuss about" on a "meta" level. As in saying "there needn't be any 'hatred' of evil". I would say that such hatred toward TRUE EVIL (you'll know it when you see it or you'll be in on it), is a signal of psychospiritual HEALTH when it is proportionate to the facts of the reality of those with which one is engaged, with whom the THEATER of PERCEPTION is taking place. And us all getting together who are Good and having a Tea Party is one fine thing to imagine, but that's what is *not wanted by a staggering number of people who've all sold their souls and devoted their soles to the works of those who prefer to, well, eat children's innocence, basically."

I see that David Icke suffers from moral ambiguity, and therefore ought not speak of evaluating alternatives according to their relative merits on far lesser matters, such as what sort of cognitive and moral dissonance I should choose if I want to be fashionable in the world of delusional fools pageant of all is Love and Light if it weren't for my projecting Good and evil onto it as though they were what they are. If I wouldn't insist that white is white and black is black, or use red or blue, or whatever other facile example of a dyad of options. Because in the end you either see the difference or you don't, just as with red and blue, a command and a supplication. I hope I've generalized upon the theme enough that this isn't mistaken for being "about David Icke" or "Alex Jones" or "The Gnostic Truth" or any other such petty reference point. It is about the substance of the matter, and men of Good Conscience cannot afford to get this wrong.

I recommend studying those two videos, and even reading David Icke's great books on exposing evil and its war on Good. Then contrast all that with his strange insistence on a neutral tone concerning matters of utmost polarity, but he even dismisses that fundamental polarity which is extereme and real, which is Eternal Antivalence in Essence, which is not a matter of black and white, nor grey, nor any other color. It is a matter of Right and wrong, Benevolent and wicked. And men of Good conscience shouldn't even verge toward being evasively wishy washy on the difference between those two. And as one would expect only ONE of these two forces would be prone to permit its being distinguished from the other... not that one, this other one. The GOOD ONE. The Good one is ALWAYS Good but only shows up with such a generic form of its name when something truly evil contrasts with it. That is not a projection of the Good, that is a manifestation of another category of "being which should not be". There is no excuse for confusing this distinction for lesser matters in the manner of a buffoon.

I don't say that David Icke is a buffoon, not by any means. I simply think that with all he damn well knows about this world's evils, that he would suggest its evil, malicious structure has no vicarious, adventitious independence from how benevolent people fail to project benevolent things into it, from how Good people fail realize what David Icke realizes that is possible if only... if only the world had more Good people in it (though it would help if they realized at least as much, in spite of the overabundance of zombies which may still thwart their realization). He's an intelligent, highly coherent and logical thinker, and he has a wonderfully benevolent, tough and sensitive personality. All the less cause for suggesting that Good and evil are not fundamental and Antivalent opposites which transcend relative expressions and are the most absolute distinctions which can exist, even more absolute than existence or non-existence.  

But I can't marvel at his positive traits, such as seeing the fundamental connection between Knowledge and Solutions, so that the former is a necessary precursor of the latter not least for being part of any Solution that can manifest, without also marveling at how he might suggest that the solution is merely all people being informed, for many are rather committed to evil, either wittingly or willingly, or both. The once who are unwilling to wittingly engage in such, if they maintain their wits about them, will not be involved in the evil. And yes, that helps. But that is not sufficient to turn an army of sell-souls to vanish as apparitions of our own imagining. That requires a firmer justice. So how can I not marvel that he seems to suggest that such absolutes and proportionally absolute attitudes are anywhere at the root of the problem of evil's persistence in the world?  

And he is Right to talk about taking sincere and constructive action, and I cannot help but agree with him on that and admire his manner of relating that Truth. And he himself has contributed much to reaching a solution to the problem. But changing the way that Good people add to a problem by getting out of their own way is great, but it does not preclude a red-blooded hate of evil and willingness to grind it into oblivion. Certainly you wouldn't want less than that in your "toolbox" should you ever walk upon a scene only Jimmy fucking Seville could adore.

Blatant Contradiction is Contradictory

Facts, Truth, Logic, Principles, Morality, Conscience, Honesty, Common Sense all dictate that Blatant Contradiction is Contradictory. Act accordingly to your character and either see it for what it is or turn away from reality like a coward. Which if these choices you make will "trigger" your Eternal Destiny as an immediate fact in your very being. If you are evil and like lying and tormenting people "because you can and it is fun", they at least recognize reality for what seems to be... a playpark for evil pieces of shit with strangely-besieged real heroes being dragged through the mud by people with their heads on backwards, by essentially evil people who've been built from the outside in by carrots of bribery and sticks of threat, whose very lives are framed upon the scaffolding of extortion in some proportion between those who extort and those who submit to it, not as those robbed, but as those SUCKERED. The only people dragged down against the very great of what they deserve are the only people with moral high ground under their feet IN SUBSTANCE, an the only one everyone loves to scapegoat by making them VILLIFIED IN NAME. If you are not among those, count yourselves blessed, because for having grant to Real Life, you alone will endure past this false world's final end. But just as evil beings must consciously live BY MEANS OF this trickery, so must GOOD Beings dispel it and defeat it by means of the same careful attention to the TRUTH of matters revealed by any contradiction between its IMAGE and ITS SUBSTANCE. That, therefore, is what they attack most truly, the capacity to exercise such judgement. It is not a political battle waged with flesh and blood, but one waged with one's Mind and Spirit against a weaponized culture which seeks to destroy that REAL BASIS FOR AUTHORITY, Best Wisdom and Good Faith, which the said "establishment" CLAIMS to have by their appearances and use of imagery and ritual, but which is exactly what they seek to destroy in FACT.

Alex Jones brings up an excellent discussion. But as soon as I saw a picture of the issue as portrayed by the media of mass destruction, I saw the entire issue.



So, the supposed motive for the dreaded 9-11 attacks is that "they", "the turrurrists" (and supposedly not crypto-technocrats and Plutonian "archons" entrenched in the entire "upper crust" of society and all its institutions of organized criminality with a fraudulent claim to authority to protect any public trust...), they hate our free-dumbs. That's premise one. So, we must curtail our freed-uhms in order to protect them... (another spurious premise, call it premise two) It is also pretended that the keepers of the public tRUST, our tRUSTED "betters", they would not prefer to accomplish premise one's objectives with a minimum of premise two's "necessary actions". Because they value free-dumb. But finally it turns out that we are warned that if we exercise those freedoms in their SUBSTANCE (which should undergird the two premises' supposed merit to our attentive concern), we supposedly run the risk of going past some arbitrary line above which that minimum curtailment of freedom in order to protect free-dumb (there is a difference other than just spelling) is no longer sufficient to "protect" those we'll here just call "us" from those we'll here just call "them". In this result, they have declared that Donald Trump represents such an excess when he says we should have strong, well-defended borders, immigrants who are at minimum legal entered and ideally thoroughly vetted for "clearance" (at least as much as we would with visas for already legitimate visitors, as would ANY country with any sense). They've said that he is wrong to criticize a foreign policy that is an utter failure AT BEST, and is instrumental to fomenting the motives of the TURRURRISTS (real and contrived) AT MINIMUM. In that he would have us with a strong and prosperous socioeconomic condition which has put him out of favor with corrupt politicians and those for whom they serve as colossal prostitutes of power to conduct evil under righteous pretenses. In that he is willing to speak frankly and yet inclusively without being a cutout who robotically (or cheesily) reads from a teleprompter. In that the CIA-controlled media hates him the same way that Edward Bernays and Big Brother would hate him. In all those respects he simply obliterates the competition among those running for office as being someone who stands FOR what "the turrurists hate" and also as being someone who stands AGAINST what "the turrurists" want. WHICH MEANS that he is the most appropriate person for the office of "The Decider" of arbitrary lines which are to be drawn past which the exercise of freedom might just need to be monitored to ensure that "the turrurists" don't get a likely jump on us which would be difficult to defend against without at least some recognition, preparation, and constant/consistent risk management which is simply a part of everyone's due diligence anyway. All this demands a capacity to demonstrate the proper sense and sensibility, the proper rationality and good faith which are to be the proper precursors for the proper judgement needed to render such a duty feasible for a single person to perform on behalf of an entire nation. So we can already see that the fauxny media has claimed that it is better to have a piece of horse manure for president rather than someone who can actually put forth THE CORRECT AND SANE promises that at least promise the right things! So do we even really need to listen to their bullshit when they arbitrarily declare that we should believe that they (and their illustrious sources) don't have a special motive for claiming that: Electing Donald Trump for President = Voting FOR a terrorist act to occur.... Just think about the those miscreants and those behind them who pull their strings like Pinocchio, who put forth  such a simple and obviously errant logic to justify their "stand on terror" in the form of REAL HARMS TO YOUR RIGHTS, the very substance of concern with terrorists in the first place (supposedly), the protection of which hinges upon policies that sound a lot more like what Trump is promising and nothing like what is in place now, which would be continued or worsened by the other candidates (and that's THEIR promise!). Do that, and look at the MEDIA, which promotes brain death and an illogical and wrong stance on matters of public health, safety, culture, and the truth in ANYTHING, in other words a CRAPSACK-WORLD LEVEL OF PHONY-ASSED, LYING-ASSED, COUNTERFEIT MONEY-TAKING, PROPAGANDA MINISTRY, DEVIL'S ASS-KISSING FAKE MEDIA, and see how the two cooperate against one man because of his policies which are MUCH more in line with the public trust and interest than those who oppose him, and decide which world you'd prefer:
1) A WORLD OF HYPOCRISY AND DEBASEMENT which is supposedly made more stable by not triggering evil people by electing a good president 2) A WORLD OF LOGICAL GOOD SENSE AND ETHICAL DECENCY which is utterly defeated by the people suggesting the crapsack world in 1)

And in closing, given that it looks like a duck, sounds like a duck, and walks like a duck, it's probably a duck. Based upon the harm "turrurists" do and the harm that those do who claim to wish to protect us from said harms, given the motives in both cases (control), and given the networking between them and the many aspects of criminality and corruption and debasement of character they also share in those who occupy their management and actors in the field, it is very hard to distinguish these two groups of people the more that we see nonsense like what Graham suggested and fail to recognize it for what it is.

We already live in a lame-duck crapscak dystopia. Why add to that the WILLING CHOICE not to see it for what it is?

Woe to the Last Man: May the Best of the Worst Yield to the Worst of the Best, but Just Barely

I admire the courage, integrity and consistency of the Infowars journalist team, as well as those of studio crew and Alex Jones himself, along with anyone else in history against whom it has been said "Ecce Homo". Especially of those who go out and into the presence of those mobs. Those mob elements are operating basically strictly on their brain stems. Everything else is reflex, whether when they recapitulate their indoctrination, brainwashing,or basically just their ignorant opinions (mixed with truths used as non sequiter). They are visceral, on edge, probably on a cocktail of various psychoactive substances to fuel their aggression and overly expansive propaganda spewing laced with 80% vulgarity, 95% non-sense, and 1-2% of truths and facts which are egregiously inserted into invalid arguments, and sometimes outright fallacies and incoherent, petulant invective. Whatever your view of honest people courageous enough to stand for the Truth and Right with reason and action, whether simply individuals of no label, "Inforwarriors", "Truthers", or any other label which may be used either to identify or stereotype others, and no matter what your views of Trump and of those who actively (or even passively) support him, they and their positions are to be contrasted with the loony-bin insanity and outrageous hypocrisy of those who oppose them and their message, of a thoroughly corrupt system and establishment (overt and covert), and of the worst in human nature in general (this is not an argument FOR them, though it also is and should be, but a case in point of facts of history, science, and current events). And no matter the more pressing matters, this media actually uses language and thought suitable for mature and educated/educable adults, and the brainwashing mass media is now trying to imitate them. Jeff Rense, and David Icke, Jim Kirwan, and many others, seemingly without interest in rotating the exposure of Truth as being MERELY or MAINLY a function of their own ego-gratification or opportunism, but seem nevertheless to be successful in their efforts, these and others are also commendable for their honorable works.
But that video, among many others, demonstrates empirical evidence of what is going on that cannot be denied no matter what sort of wishy-washy flip-floppy delusional paradigm someone twisted their head to harbor. That is a crucible of chaos, stupidity, entropy and animalism that reflects a basic reality of how our society operates, and of course as a symptom of an undercurrent of control mechanisms using counterfeit money and improper taxation, covert technological grids and social networks operating as a secret police entity, all with only a very truncated minority of people who have maintained courage, integrity, and consistency. It seems for sure that Infowars, and those who rationally, honestly and sincerely subscribe to much of its content can be counted among those who remain right in the head and heart, both with regard to common sense as well as decency. It is a positive sign for them. He is just one example, there are many other "platforms" of "time passage" which enable spiritual entities to manifest their true natures in thought, word and deed. There are also many in the world who are not directly connected to these events or people just mentioned, but who have also resisted violent takeover of their minds and hearts. There are many who would not negotiate their very souls, and I trust that either they were gifted at birth with a Spiritual Conscience or were granted one due to their ability to absorb the Spiritual Truth when it was presented to them in whatever forms... Either way, that is the True Baptism. Those involved in the evil activities which have brought society to such living death now breaking down into a feverish decomposition into putrescent self-destruction, they are accursed in due proportion to their involvement and complicity, witting or not. This is not only a matter of record, but of what must soon come upon the world simply due to eschatological inevitabilities involved, completely aloof to any suppositions derived from any texts whatsoever. It is a matter of demonstrable reality, not a matter presupposed upon my or anyone's supposed authority. 

Let's just say that if I persist with only observable facts (including what is found in texts and media from ALL sources), logic, and intuition without contradiction to logic, I can demonstrate a bare minimum that is, in its impact due to the implications which immediately arise from those demonstractions, a proof in essence of what would be no less astounding to the mind of a thinking man than would be the stories about highly intelligent and capricious giants ruling the earth which are told by some. No less astounding because the technological means exist to supply us with an organizational equivalent of a caste system of controllers and controlled which acts as a "covert Leviathan" in the sense alluded to by Thomas Hobbes. The use of dual-purposed infrastructure for a proclaimed "public purpose" which in fact has a covert function of manipulating people by a form of overpowering control methods catalyzed by advanced and covert technological methodologies which, taken in aggregate, equate to a monolithic giant, one set aside for each man, woman and child, for the sake of total tyranny over each and every one, but with a pecking order according to a game contrived by said monsters, for the sake of their own entertainment, or with no motive other than their whim.  They do not rule over others who are by nature smaller than them in any spiritual sense, but they rule by means of covert hobbling of others who are then by coercion made to be dwarvish by comparison to the proper stature which is thereby suppressed. Then the "archons" systematically exempt themselves from such treatments and experiences, and pretend that the final result is a pageantry of differentiated natures exhibiting outwardly what they really are inwardly, while the exact contrary is the case.

Confucius, Hobbes,Rousseau Plato, Foucault, Laozi, and many others have referred to this epic monstrosity Hobbes called The Leviathan and which I call The Granfalloon. A beast monstrosity with an artificial consciousness, using men's minds as a host through which to act parasitically in the form of the status quo which manifests as a quasi-mythical entity referred to as "the state", which can include the state of the art of corruption in any field, whether of government or any other institution, to include academia and the management of economics and culture. In short, any area of human action whatsoever, including the contents of men's minds and spirits, may be or become hollowed-out facades for use on a whim by those who pull their strings whether by bribe or threat, and who seek to condition for the long term, without a drop of morality or inkling of justice. Plenty of movies are made about it with characters and plot on various scales, from the 2-bit lone wolf criminal to a group of perverts who designed a hologram in which to imprison their victims for protracted torture as a means of psychic cannibalism, whatever the envisaged modality of criminality: and it turns out that our world is, even in the most generous interpretation available, closer to being a bad orchard with a few good apples per tree at best, and each of them is severely bruised. In many of the cases of the art of today, Art Reflects Reality. (the analogy between this interpretation of art and "the real world" makes sense to those who have the proper "insight" into the world in which they live, or who are not corrupt psychopaths themselves. If they lack insight into the phenomena (the first case) then they are ignorant de re, and if in the second they are participants, then they simply feign ignorance so as to attempt to gaslight those who have insight but aren't card-carrying criminals, and this is the textbook way that "psychological projection works as a defense mechanism to defend the ego of the would be controller over their would be slave, the "manipulable object" or "Teddy Person").
Whether the world is controlled by monolithic orders of evil fools, evil and uncannily intelligent giants, some mixture of the two, or whatever else drives it to behave like an irrational band of fools and knaves, among whom speaking the Truth is pretended to be the unique privilege of the few, it is therefore a matter of the imminent future as it stems from the knowns of the now that what will soon pass cannot be something of comfort except to a grave optimist, or a rosy pessimist. This world cannot go on this way. It cannot go on as a control grid of manipulation through deception, coercion, and cooption. Therefore, at its current rate, it will end harshly. Be that as it may, and in whatever form it takes, woe to the person who delays his commitments to Truth and Right until the very last moment of this world's existence (which implies by deduction of their own life's duration), because in regards THOSE OF THAT MENTALITY they are rejecting Truth as a habit until the very end. Aside from demonstrating diminishing humanity in that process, they are insulting the Spiritual Origin of Truth Itself, and that alienation ill-prepares them for deserved and poetically unexpected ends which they could and do face at any moment. An end which approaches each and all no matter their nature as nascently or fluorescently expressed, in the past, now or at the end. That has always been True, and ALL THE GREAT SPIRITUAL TEACHERS HAVE SAID THIS. But at this time... this "unexpected end" is called for by invocation of Eschatology, and is most that a sane and decent person can reasonably or rightly expect, even when accounting for the strangest of miracles which undoubtedly will occur (those will not bode well for evil beings, however). That puts all chips on the table "for all time" in the last round of phenomena that this ENTIRE WORLD will EVER HAVE and NOT AGAIN. In other words, not just for the selfish fools who despise Truth and Innocence, but those who simply WON'T COMMIT TO THEIR DEFENSE AND UPHOLDING, they go to the point now in THIS generation of escalating the process to be the COMPLETE END OF THE REALITY OF THEIR WORLD. After this, even if reincarnation were possible, or even if meaning were only transferred "through the genes" and their reactivation of the conscientious consciousness (where possible), and otherwise nothing but further dissolution into spiritual death (for those who have inherited evil spirits, and we know who some of them are don't we?), or whether one had delayed a commitment to either nature for incarnation after incarnation (whether as something "other than" conscious bodies or merely "as" DNA reactivation of consciousnesses bound to lineages), or any overlapping between these possibilities, no matter the putative configurations of spiritual substances, bodies, or minds taken in any senses; NOW ALL THAT ENDS FOR ALL TIME. To dance with the edge of that possibility til the last moment, that sort of brinksmanship with corruption, that is the lowest mentality. As things seem to stand now, we may be past the point where that can be a recoverable person who has that mentality. The "Great End" is now a formality, like a funeral for someone who already lived life as a moral mummy at best. Just in case I'm wrong about that, act as though the next moment may be that moment. Don't measure the worthiness of how your time is spent by how long your body can endure, but attempt to prioritize and act upon this very moment in a way worthy of your values before the last opportunity vanishes, whether it may vanish for just you or for you and everyone else. This way, whether by way of a meteor crashing into this domain, or else through psychotronically-engineered social collapse into chaos and then a meteor, you will be prepared in your Spirit.